YOU CAN EDIT THIS PAGE! Just click any blue "Edit" link and start writing!

Difference between revisions of "Wikitravel:Star nominations"

From Wikitravel
Jump to: navigation, search
(Washington, D.C./Capitol Hill)
(Washington, D.C./Capitol Hill)
Line 92: Line 92:
This article is well-written, complete, and similar to other "star" district articles in D.C. in terms of format and style. It has a great map and very thorough information on all the major sites. I see no reason why this article shouldn't be a star. [[User:Bocablue|Bocablue]] ([[User talk:Bocablue|talk]]) 15:19, 20 July 2013 (EDT)
This article is well-written, complete, and similar to other "star" district articles in D.C. in terms of format and style. It has a great map and very thorough information on all the major sites. I see no reason why this article shouldn't be a star. [[User:Bocablue|Bocablue]] ([[User talk:Bocablue|talk]]) 15:19, 20 July 2013 (EDT)
* '''Support''', [[User:IBAlex|IBAlex]] ([[User talk:IBAlex|talk]]) 16:36, 22 July 2013 (EDT)
* '''Support''', [[User:IBAlex|IBAlex]] ([[User talk:IBAlex|talk]]) 16:36, 22 July 2013 (EDT)
* '''Support''', [[User:Adzas|Adzas]] ([[User talk:Adzas|talk]]) 17:56, 22 July 2013 (EDT)
==Nominations to remove Star status==
==Nominations to remove Star status==

Revision as of 22:00, 22 July 2013

This is where we determine whether an article is ready to be classified as Star status. Even though the criteria are fairly objective, it's good to get some additional eyes to look over a page and confirm that it's ready before elevating it to Star. For reference, here's the general description, from Wikitravel:Article status:

The article is essentially complete. It meets all of the above criteria. It follows the manual of style exactly or is the exception that proves the rule. Prose is not only near-perfect grammatically but also tight, effective, and enjoyable. It has appropriate illustrations, such as photos and a map. Enough breadth and depth of material is presented that anyone familiar with the subject of the article would have little to point out as absent. Future changes to this kind of article would reflect changes in the subject (eg: a museum closes, a hotel price changes, a new airport is built) more than they'd require improvements in the coverage.

Objective criteria for Star status varies depending on the kind of article it is. For more concrete guidance on this, see:

If you feel that an article currently at Star status is no longer worthy, or never was to begin with, this is also the place to nominate to de-star an article.


Star articles: Last minute checklist

  • The article must be complete — See definition above.
  • Grammar and spelling must be perfect — See definition above. Prose should be stylistically superior and effective.
  • Illustration: the article should be appropriately illustrated with pictures and a Wikitravel-style map, with all attractions marked.
  • Listings should be in alphabetical order — geographical order is also acceptable if it is deemed better.
  • No duplications: a listing should appear under one section only — if there is ambiguity, put it under the section that it most applies to.
  • Time and date formats: Use: M, Tu, W, Th, F, Sa, Su; (Examples: "Jul-Oct M-F 12:00-23:00" and "Daily 09:20-21:10").
  • Section introductions are not mandatory but should be present when they serve to improve a section.
  • Use "—" (mdash) for breaks in thought.
  • Use abbreviations for addresses, etc. Eg: St, Ave, Ln, Blvd.

You can nominate any "guide" quality article you think is ready to be declared a "star". Please do not nominate an article if you know that it falls short of the criterion above — refer to the info box for a last minute checklist. If there are other nominations on this page, add yours to the bottom of the list. The basic format of a nomination is as follows:

===[[Article name]]===
This has everything we're looking for, plus a swell kitchen sink. ~~~~

Having done this, please replace the {{guide...}} tag with {{starnomination}} at the bottom of the nominated article. You also need to post a note at the Wikitravel:Travellers' Pub to publicise your nomination — remember to tell people that partial critiques and even just a few quick words of support are welcome. These steps help draw attention to the article's nomination, improving the discussion as to whether it should be awarded star status.


Please comment on whether you agree that the nominated article is ready, with a bullet point (*) and your signed opinion. If you think it's ready, a simple "Support" will do. If not, explain what you think is missing or not up to standards. You don't have to leave a detailed critique to vote on the star — partial critiques are welcome, and feel free to just voice your support for the hard work someone else has done.

===[[Article name]]===
This has everything we're looking for, plus a swell kitchen sink. TravelNut 25:25, 31 Feb 2525 (EDT)

* The sink isn't properly formatted, and there are no "budget" places to sleep. ~~~~

After three weeks of discussion, if a consensus is reached, then that article becomes a star, and the discussion should be archived. Note that a consensus means that all outstanding objections should have been addressed and dropped; if issues remain then the discussion should either continue or, if they cannot or will not be addressed in reasonable time, the article should be added to the slush pile. Regardless of the outcome, it is useful to copy the nomination discussion to the article's talk page.

Archiving checklist

  • Remove the nomination discussion from this page and paste it to both the archives and to the talk page of the new star article;
  • Add the article to Wikitravel:Star articles (and change the map on that page);
  • Update the article status template on the article from guide to star;
  • Add {{title-icons|star-icon}} to the bottom of the article; (see also Template:Title-icons if more than one title icon is required)
  • Add the article to the top of the list on the Main Page, and remove the oldest star article from the bottom of the list.

Nominations for Star status

For an archive of previous successful nominations please see Wikitravel:Star nominations/Archives.

Retiring abroad

Could this be our first star travel topic? Teaching English has been nominated and slushed; as far as I know no others have even been nominated.

It is not entirely complete — see the talk page for comment on that — but I think it is at least close to star level. Of course I'm the only author so far, so I cannot really judge. Comments here or contributions could fairly easily get it the last bit of the way, I think. Pashley 02:33, 20 June 2011 (EDT)

Query. Really like this article and would love to see it as a Star. Are there though any criteria for travel topic status?--Burmesedays 02:01, 23 June 2011 (EDT)
Link at top of this page takes you to Wikitravel:Travel_topic_status. Pashley 02:47, 23 June 2011 (EDT)
Ah yes :). That will teach me for not looking. --Burmesedays 03:49, 23 June 2011 (EDT)
Also Burmesedays, it may be useful to keep in mind as you read the stated goal within the article: "This article covers moving abroad to retire."
Are there any countries where you simply cannot retire in even if you want to or that you absoultely have to move to/become a citizen to live in? I tried looking up Uzbekistan, Kenya and Senegal, for example, and couldn't find any information on how to retire in these countries. Perhaps they have investor's visas, but maybe not.
The article is also highly centralized around retiring to Asia, which I know is the most common, but some geographical diversity in examples and pictures would be good. There are plenty of amazing coastal cities in Africa, for example, that have the same sort of exotic appeals that may attract someone to Thailand or the Caribbean, but it's difficult to know what/how much information applies for areas outside of Asia. ChubbyWimbus 04:04, 23 June 2011 (EDT)
Yep I am sure that is the case. I suspect finding the information (if it exists at all) for most African countries would be a bit of a nightmare. :::This is a very worthy topic, and one I am quite close to as I have assisted a number of retirees in understanding what is involved in acquiring a retirement residency visa in Indonesia. I think Pashley has done an excellent job with the structure of the article, it is certainly well written, and as far as I can tell, it seems complete. --Burmesedays 10:43, 24 June 2011 (EDT)
Not the first Star travel topic. Chicago skyline guide has that distinction, and there are 5 others related to Scuba Diving around Cape Town. See Wikitravel:Star article#Travel topics
South Africa has quite a number of Europeans who have retired here. Mostly Germans and Britons, who take advantage of the good exchange rate to enjoy the milder climate. Many are what is locally known as "Swallows", as they tend to go north for the winter, and so don't actually stay here permanently. However some do, though permanent is never certain while one is still alive. I have no idea what the arrangements are, as I am local, so retiring here would be a natural progression for me, requiring no special procedures. The information must be available somewhere. • • • Peter (Southwood) Talk 08:55, 26 June 2011 (EDT)

This one has been hanging out there a long time. I would like to propose that it is promoted to star. --burmesedays 12:22, 27 August 2011 (EDT)

  • Strong Support the geographical expansion can follow afterwards and, if and when it does, the article will need to be split so it does not become too long. --W. Franke-mailtalk 07:12, 25 September 2012 (EDT)
  • Strong Support Mmmm, just read this after noticing the premature Bangkok nomination below. This one definitely is a star! -- 16:15, 14 January 2013 (EST)
  • Strong Support An excellent article largely constructed by one outstanding editor. There does not seem to be any opposition to this article's promotion to Star status forthwith so this should happen right away so that other editors working on travel topics have a Star article to emulate. (Since I have now registered an account, I shall strike my earlier support made before I registered.)--118dot93dot73dot30 19:15, 28 February 2013 (EST)


This is a fully complete and well developed article that follows Manual of Style and has great variety of pictures and maps. District articles have "guide" and"star" statuses. IBAlex 15:15, 14 January 2013 (EST)

Still needs a good copy edit to correct grammar errors and comply with Dates and Times. I'll spend a couple of minutes on it, but maybe Seligne will have the time to do a more thorough job before she leaves... -- 16:01, 14 January 2013 (EST)
Would be great! Thank you! IBAlex 16:03, 14 January 2013 (EST)

Washington, D.C./Capitol Hill

This article is well-written, complete, and similar to other "star" district articles in D.C. in terms of format and style. It has a great map and very thorough information on all the major sites. I see no reason why this article shouldn't be a star. Bocablue (talk) 15:19, 20 July 2013 (EDT)

  • Support, IBAlex (talk) 16:36, 22 July 2013 (EDT)
  • Support, Adzas (talk) 17:56, 22 July 2013 (EDT)

Nominations to remove Star status

Whenever possible, articles should be fixed rather than "de-starred". Only nominate articles which cannot be easily elevated/restored to "star" quality. Replace the Star status tag on the article with {{destarnomination}}. Vote "Star" or "Not Star".

Failed nominations

See Wikitravel:Star nominations/Slush pile for nominations that failed or were withdrawn. Articles should only be renominated when they address criticisms from the previous nomination. Please add the {{starpotential}} to the top of the article's discussion page.