YOU CAN EDIT THIS PAGE! Just click any blue "Edit" link and start writing!

Wikitravel:Routebox navigation

From Wikitravel
Revision as of 11:17, 15 December 2008 by Texugo (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

Template:Disclaimer Routebox navigation is a supplement to the Get out section of an article which allows the user to browse directly from article to article along a given route or combination of routes. The box contains a logo for each route in the center. To the left and right of the logo are 1) the direction the route follows, 2) the next minor destination, i.e. the next destination for which we have an article, and 3) the next major destination or major thoroughfare junction. More detailed descriptions of how to choose these follows in the sections below.

A set of templates is used to create the boxes. The template is named according to the number of routes to be displayed. Thus, a box which displays 5 routes must be named routebox-5. The template is placed at the end of the Get out section, just before the Wikipedia and language links, and looks like this: Template:Routebox-3 The above box is produced by the following code:

| image1=US-287.png
| directionl1=N
| majorl1=[[Amarillo]]
| minorl1=[[Memphis (Texas)|Memphis]]
| directionr1=S
| majorr1=[[Wichita Falls]]
| minorr1=[[Quanah]]

| image2=US-62.png
| directionl2=N
| majorl2=[[Altus (Oklahoma)|Altus]]
| minorl2=[[Lawton (Oklahoma)|Lawton]]
| directionr2=S
| majorr2=[[Lubbock]]
| minorr2=[[Paducah (Texas)|Paducah]]

| image3=US-83.png
| directionl3=N
| majorl3=[[Shamrock]]
| minorl3=[[Wellington]]
| directionr3=S
| majorr3=[[Abilene]]
| minorr3=[[Paducah (Texas)|Paducah]]

Listing order

Preference should be given in the following order:

  • Famous historical routes (the Silk Road, Route 66, Santiago da Compstela)
  • High speed train lines
  • Regular train lines
  • Major national highways, in numerical order
  • Minor national highways, in numerical order
  • State highways, private toll roads, or scenic routes, in numerical order

Criteria for route inclusion

Preference should be given to routes which are most often used by travellers in the given area. For example, listing a passenger train route through the western US is considered too much detail since 99% of travellers go by car in the region, and trains in the region don't have regular service which allows for hop-on hop-off use. Similarly, listing roads in a Central African country doesn't make much sense either, since most travellers see the area by bus or hired car.

In general, to be included, a route should have at least 4 destinations for which we have articles. Smaller routes such as state highways should be omitted if they duplicate the same access path as another route. Like other sections of our articles, the number of listings should never exceed nine. Destinations under 1 million people should generally not exceed 5 listings.

Assigning directions

Directions should be assigned according to official signage when available. In general, the two directions indicated by the routebox should be consistent for the length of the route when possible. Exceptions can be made when official signage indicates, or for loop lines such as a highway which circumnavigates an island or, for example, Tokyo's Yamanote line.

Assigning major destinations

Criteria for what is assigned as a major destination in each direction depends on the relative importance of the route.

  • Disagreements about whether a given city should be considered a major destination should be resolved on the talk page of the city in question.

For major national routes

For major national routes, the norms are major junction cities of the region and national parks. Major cities are typically cities of 500,000 or more. For highway systems with designated control cities such as the US Interstate system, this serves as a good guide as to what should be designated as a major destination.

  • If the route goes for 2 hours' travel time or more without a major city of 500,000 or more, the next biggest city in the region should be used to break it up. For example, there is a long stretch between Albuquerque and Oklahoma City along I-40, so Amarillo and Tucumcari serve as major destinations.
  • If the route passes near a major city, that city can be included as a major city if signage along the route indicates it. For example, Pittsburg could be included along I-79 because signage for Pittsburg via Spur I-279 is placed along I-79 in the region.

For lesser national routes and subnational routes

For lesser national routes which tend to pass through smaller towns the criteria is less stringent as to what can be selected as a major destination. The same control destinations should be included as those for the major routes, but in addition:

  • For routes away from large cities, preference for major destinations is given to places which have junctions with more important routes. For example if a less important US Route intersects an Interstate at a smaller city, that city should still be used as a control. Thus, for US-83 in the Texas Panhandle, Shamrock is used as a control city because it has a major junction with I-40.
  • Some routes may pass through many destinations of roughly the same size or importance without passing through any major city at all. In these cases, the next destination may be used as the control.

Assigning minor destinations

The minor destination in each direction should always be the next place along the route for which we have an article. This should include any national parks or state parks unless the next city falls inside of said park. Care should be taken in assuring that nothing is skipped. Running names from a map into our search engine is generally a good way to ensure complete coverage.

Termini, merging, and rural junctions

  • When a route ends at the next destination, the next destination is listed as minor, and the field for major destination should read "END" (without quotes).
  • When a route ends at the current destination, the minor field is left blank, and the major field should read "END" (without quotes).
  • When a road route ends at a perpendicular route at a place for which we have no article, "Ends at routename" is written in place of "END".
  • When a road route merges with another route going in the same direction, "Merges with" plus the name of the route is written in place of "END".
  • When a road route crosses another of equal or higher importance at a place for which we have no article, an unlinked text note reading "Junction routename" should be inserted, along with a hyphen and space on the appropriate side.
  • If a route ends at a city or named destination for which we have no article, the destination name should be left unlinked.
  • If a route ends very near a major city, in a suburb for example, and the traveller could reasonably find their way into that city, that city may be used as a major destination.

A fictitious box below illustrates how the above points should look when utilized: Template:Routebox-4

Rest areas, travel information centers, and picnic areas

Rest areas, travel information centers, and picnic areas can be inserted in addition to the two destinations in each direction. They should only be inserted when they fall between the current article and the next destination and should be spaced with a single space and hyphen on the appropriate side in the field of the minor destination, as below:

Routes through Routebox navigation
SayreAltus  N noframe S  LondonJunction I-20 - Brady
AmarilloQuanah  N noframe S  → Rest area - Wichita FallsFort Worth