YOU CAN EDIT THIS PAGE! Just click any blue "Edit" link and start writing!

Talk:Cairngorms National Park

From Wikitravel
Revision as of 08:58, 25 May 2011 by Burmesedays (talk | contribs) (Soliciting opinions about a link)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Soliciting opinions about a link[edit]

Hello, everyone! An enthusiastic contributor has posted this[1] link, which I moved up to the topmost section of the article. It's the "official website for Accommodation and Activities in Cairngorms National Park." By any other name, it appears to be a "hotel or travel booking services or aggregator," which would violate the first bulleted item on Wikitravel:External links#What not to link to. However, the fact that its homepage is copyright Cairngorms Business Partnership gives it what seems to me a genuine official status most booking services and aggregators lack. Is this site a gray area? What do you all think? Ikan Kekek 04:04, 25 May 2011 (EDT)

It can be very difficult at times to determine whether a site is "official" or not. See for example the city/town sites of some US towns - they can be little more than commercial booking sites. In this case, all the material at is copyright The Caingorms Business Partnership. This is a good source of information about that organisation: The official link for the Caingorms National Park is ,and in my view that is the only one that should be used. Http:// is a booking service, albeit one that is a good deal less nasty than most that try to post at WT, and should be disallowed as per Wikitravel:External links#What not to link to. --Burmesedays 04:33, 25 May 2011 (EDT)
As an aside, I think the efforts of anybody familiar with this wonderful NP would be better placed improving what is a woeful article, rather than posting an accommodation service link. This is an A Grade destination with a very poor article, and any help from familiar users would be much appreciated.--Burmesedays 04:36, 25 May 2011 (EDT)
I tend to agree on both counts. I would welcome user Visitcairngorms' input in this discussion and appreciate the notice you gave on his/her user talk page. Ikan Kekek 04:48, 25 May 2011 (EDT)