Two things have crossed my mind when I first saw this page:
- Shouldn't we move the old go-between/liaison reports from en: to this page so we have the whole language version history here?
- I know this sounds a bit crazy, but considering that we are moving away from en: being the "central" language version, wouldn't that mean that en: would start having to report too? Rmx 13:35, 1 August 2006 (EDT)
- Yes and yes. B-) --Evan 14:13, 1 August 2006 (EDT)
Reports as sub-pages
I've just realized that pages following a format like this - Liaison reports/Portuguese/March 2007 - automatically show a breadcrumb menu that facilitates navigation between the reports, which the full name ("language wikitravel liaison report for month year") format does not. I propose we create reports as sub-pages of the Liaison reports page from now on. -- Ricardo (Rmx) 16:08, 10 March 2007 (EST)
- better still, why don't we use s'thing like the isIn template? It would end up looking like this -
- Liaison reports:hindi liaison reports:hindi wikitravel r'port for xxxxxx
Upamanyu -- Write2me 07:40, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
Starting up reports again?
These liaison reports are very useful, but many haven't been updated for a year or so. Any specific reason the reporting fell off? Is there somewhere else I should be looking for status updates on all the different language versions? I'd support starting these up again. Any thoughts? JuCo 16:11, 28 April 2008 (EDT)
- Well, it's a volunteer effort to write them. The go-betweens are listed in Language versions, you can always pester them to write up a report if they haven't done one in a long while. Jpatokal 04:36, 29 April 2008 (EDT)
- I strongly believe we should contact all the liaisons and encourage them to leave a report according to the guidelines. That includes the english version which seems to lack liaisons altogether. Riggwelter 11:23, 30 July 2008 (EDT)