The center for all Wikitravel images!

Article status/ko

From Wikitravel Shared
Article status : ko
Jump to: navigation, search
Article status/ko

Default Banner.jpg

위키트래벌 문건은 진화하고 성숙한데 그들이 다양한 기여자에 의해 편집됨에 따라서이다. 문건의 상태를 평가할 때 많은 요소가 고려되어야 한다. 다음의 주제 가이드라인이 이 평가를 하는데 편집자를 도울 것이다. 문건내의 정보의 양과 품질과 유용성를 고려하여야 한다. 문건의 위키트래벌의 목적문체 매뉴얼과 부합하는지가 역시 고려되어야 한다. 상태는 5-점 규모이며 무문건은 0이고 5점이 이상적이다.:

  1. Vfd - Not an article, and no real chance of ever becoming an article (or even a redirect) that meets Wikitravel's goals. An article unrelated to travel, or a page of graffiti with a nonsense title would have this status.
  1. 스텁 - An article with little or no information in it, or not formatted even close to the manual of style. An article with no template or a former copyright violation would have this status.
  2. 아웃라인 - Has at least an introduction and a template outline laid out for the article, but not much more. Some of the sections may have content, but others are empty. You can tell what this article is going to be about, but it doesn't have enough information to be useful (e.g. get you to a destination and keep you alive there).
  3. 쓸만 - An adventurous person could use the article without recourse to other information sources. For most articles, this means they could probably get to the destination, eat, and sleep with just this information. It would probably enable them to find at least the most prominent attraction there.
  4. 가이드 - The article would be helpful for the average traveler, such as offering alternatives for where to stay and eat, what to see and do, how to get in and out, etc. and provide enough information for at least a few days there. But at least a few things are missing to make this a star article. It follows the manual of style in spirit if not in detail.
  5. 스타 - The article is essentially complete. It meets all of the above criteria. It follows the manual of style exactly or is the exception that proves the rule. Prose is not only near-perfect grammatically but also tight, effective, and enjoyable. It has appropriate illustrations, such as photos and a map. Enough breadth and depth of material is presented that anyone familiar with the subject of the article would have little to point out as absent. Future changes to this kind of article would reflect changes in the subject (e.g. a museum closes, a hotel price changes, a new airport is built) more than they'd require improvements in the coverage.

Objective criteria for each status vary depending on the kind of article it is. For more concrete guidance on assigning status, see:

Star articles must go through a nomination process before their status is changed, but for any other article status anyone can plunge forward and change the status tag at the end of the article ({{guidecity}}, {{usablecountry}} and so on, see the links above for the full list). But if somebody objects and reverts your change, then state your reasons on the Talk page and let the community work out a consensus.