Welcome and Iraq weapons
Here's the welcome:
Welcome to Wikitravel. You can edit your preferences to change how the software works for you. Please take a second to look at our copyleft and policies and guidelines, but feel free to plunge forward and edit some pages. Scanning the Manual of style, especially the article templates, can give you a good idea of how we like articles formatted. If you're new to our wiki software, MediaWiki, look at the Wiki markup to get an idea of how to edit a page. If you need help, check out the help desk, and if you need some info not on there, post a message in the travellers' pub.
I always advocate for telling people you can't always be protected by security personnel, it's unfortunate, but true. Turn to CNN any day of the week and all you hear is: 10 people in Najaf killed by insurgents, the Ministry of Education stormed by militants, 128 killed in a Baghdad market bombing, 3 coalition troops killed by an IED, insurgents kidnapped a British contractor and killed his bodyguards. Its unfortunate that even the government and "coalition" troops cannot protect anyone. I adhere to the school that promotes "Thou shalt not kill", rather than the "Thou shalt not murder" school, but a clear line is drawn when it comes to self defense. I, personally, would be prepared for anything..., but that's my choice and I feel, with regards to Iraq, anyone should also prepared for the absolute worse. If you're already a target why not try to save yourself? Anyhow, whatever the consensus is I do thank you for providing your insight and if I may ask by any chance do you know of any credible and reputable protection agencies in Iraq? If you would provide that information with contact information I'd be more willing to reconsider my position. Thanks. -- Andrew H. (Sapphire) 23:34, 3 February 2007 (EST)
You requested help with spelling...I don't know if this is useful, but the Mozilla Firefox browser has an automatic spell check, which is very helpful when typing directly onto web sites like these. Free down load: Firefox 2. WindHorse 08:45, 17 February 2007 (EST)
I've again reverted the addition of "unilaterally annexed" to the Israel article. I don't disagree that it's a fact, but that article is a magnet for political edits, and per Wikitravel:Be fair#Political disputes we try to say the minimum needed by a traveler in cases where subjects are political to avoid edit wars. To use an analogy, one could state that the United States was founded by a bunch of slave owners who arrived and promptly murdered the majority of the native inhabitants, but while true such a description is likely to inflame passions rather than aid the traveler. -- Ryan 11:48, 28 February 2007 (EST)
I'm going to restore the eat section that you have cleared out of Kuwait. The contributor did not format it well, but it is a lot of information that can easily be reformatted rather than just be lost. --NJR_ZA 16:58, 5 March 2007 (EST)