Talk:One day in Tokyo
I am not the author of this page, just a casual visitor. However, I couldn't help but have a look at the link in the copyright violation notice. if you look at the bottom of that page, you'll see this note:
(Article based on Wikitravel article by Based on work by Anonymous user(s) of Wikitravel. Article used under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 1.0.)
I'm guessing that's the explanation of why the two pages are identical ;-)
Opinion: The current solution - with an "Itineraries" section on the Tokyo page, and separate pages for actual itineraries - makes sense. Itineraries can be more subjective, and may change over time; the main Tokyo page is best when objective, and unchanging. (By the way: I found the itinerary to be excellent in content & ability to follow on-street.) --Batsonjay 10:55, 3 October 2014 (EDT)
Opinion: please leave as stand-alone (do not merge with Tokyo). It is more valuable in its current concise form.
Opinion: Agree with above, I prefer it standalone. If merged w/Tokyo not only does the Tokyo article get longer and more unwieldy, but this is likely to be cut down over time as people try to make that article more concise. It's easier to link to it from the main Tokyo article as one of many possible Itineraries. —The preceding comment was added by 126.96.36.199 (talk • contribs)