Currently, Esperanto suffers for spambot attack and needs someone's janitorial work like setup eo:MediaWiki:Spamblacklist and/or blocking spambot, but unfortunately admins are not available now. I'm also feeling that we had better have more than one community bureaucrat there, since I actually had to ask JuCo for bot flag in this week. So I decide to nominate myself for bureaucrat of Esperanto -- Tatata 22:49, 27 May 2009 (EDT)
I'd like to contribute to Chinese version by doing janitorial work like coping with persistent spammer and maintaining MediaWiki pages. Currently, that language version has only one bureaucrat/administrator there, so I nominate myself for bureaucrat. -- Tatata 23:11, 27 May 2009 (EDT)
Support Neutral Oppose. Agreed, great work on the Korean portal for Shared! --PeterTalk 23:53, 6 September 2009 (EDT)
I'm withdrawing my positive vote of support until at least until the Korean WP block issue  is explained. --PeterTalk 15:50, 7 October 2009 (EDT)
I just took it esay for volunteering. But they were serious. I have retrieted to new frontiers. ko.wikia and meta. and strategy(adminship). mkpaulo.
Based on  this, Mkpaulo had problems with copyvios and uploading machine translated text in 2008, and was banned in 2009 for using multiple accounts. Jpatokal 23:53, 7 October 2009 (EDT)
It was properable to use nonlogin state editing for someone including me, admin and reader. They say you stop!! and don't say I will. That was ok.
A little more research, and no real explanation, leaves me only more concerned. (Although I realize that there is a language barrier here.) It appears he is still abusing multiple accounts on Wikia. And just look at the history of one of his discussion pages . I'd love to see the Korean Wikitravel get started, but I'm leery of giving a user admin rights who has been misbehaving on other wikis. --PeterTalk 17:00, 8 October 2009 (EDT)
Wait, what do you mean by "hacking a bureacrat's account"—did he steal a password? --PeterTalk 17:00, 8 October 2009 (EDT)
According to this a confirmed sockpupet (PaulaHelene) of mkpaulo's wikipedia account was granted unauthorized sysop rights after someone (unknown) had accessed a KoWP's admin account, which is highly suspicious (though unconfirmed). This is of course not behaviour we would like to see on our immensely more peaceful corner of the internets, so I'd like an explanation - I'm not too found of the prospect of the potentially power hungry admin in our ranks.
Though, he has done nothing but good, hard, honest, work here, and this would leave us without an admin for the forthcoming Korean version. Uh, tricky tricky. sertmann 19:40, 8 October 2009 (EDT)
Comment (Sorry, I can't speak English well.) As one of the Korean Wikipedia Administrator, I think he is a 'criminal.' Because of Administrator's account hacking incident. Please, do not 'support' for him. --Kys951 09:19, 8 October 2009 (EDT)
Oppose per kwj2772. --FriedC 06:13, 10 October 2009 (EDT)
Conclusion: Nomination failed. Jpatokal 10:46, 21 October 2009 (EDT)
Self-nominatedMr. man 12:03, 2 February 2010 (EST)
Motive:The project is abandoned, I would get him mocup since any administator or bureaucrat is not active on that wiki. Thank you very much. Mr. man
Oppose. This user's first edit on Wikitravel was to nominate himself for admin on :en. Mr. Man would do well to follow the advice given to him here, as continued self-nominations and frivolous vfd votes start to look like an abuse of these process pages. --PeterTalk 19:13, 2 February 2010 (EST)
Oppose, as user has made no contributions to mainspace :eo articles, only a user page and begging for admin rights on two other talk pages. It's a false premise, too, as the only user there that has been active in recent months is Tatata – who is indeed an admin. – D. Guillaime 01:38, 3 February 2010 (EST)
Ok, I abandon this nomination, thanks. Mr. man 05:45, 3 February 2010 (EST)
Conclusion: Nomination failed. --PeterTalk 13:24, 3 February 2010 (EST)