"Wikitravel has a speed and convenience the books' publishers can only envy." Time Europe

Difference between revisions of "Tech:Explanations for reverts/rollbacks"

From Wikitravel Shared
Jump to: navigation, search
(Alternative to manual rollbacks sought)
 
(finished)
 
(One intermediate revision by one user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:Open feature requests]]
+
 
 
It would be nice for admins to have the ability, when doing reverts/rollbacks, to say why the action was taken, as exists when we do deletes.  Is there a way of doing this already, short of doing reverts "manually," that I'm missing? -- [[User:Bill-on-the-Hill|Bill-on-the-Hill]] 12:59, 29 December 2006 (EST)
 
It would be nice for admins to have the ability, when doing reverts/rollbacks, to say why the action was taken, as exists when we do deletes.  Is there a way of doing this already, short of doing reverts "manually," that I'm missing? -- [[User:Bill-on-the-Hill|Bill-on-the-Hill]] 12:59, 29 December 2006 (EST)
 +
 +
:The handy new "Undo" button allows for this now... it involves one more click, but is still easier than the old manual reverts &ndash; [[User:Cacahuate|<font color="green">cacahuate</font>]]  <sup><small>[[User talk:Cacahuate|<font color="blue">talk</font>]]</small></sup> 20:09, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
{{finishedfeature}}

Latest revision as of 18:43, 23 October 2007

It would be nice for admins to have the ability, when doing reverts/rollbacks, to say why the action was taken, as exists when we do deletes. Is there a way of doing this already, short of doing reverts "manually," that I'm missing? -- Bill-on-the-Hill 12:59, 29 December 2006 (EST)

The handy new "Undo" button allows for this now... it involves one more click, but is still easier than the old manual reverts – cacahuate talk 20:09, 6 April 2007 (EDT)

Variants

Actions

In other languages