Beautiful banners are coming to every article and you can help!
Check out our guidelines and learn how to create your own!

Difference between revisions of "Wikitravel talk:Guide articles"

From Wikitravel
Jump to: navigation, search
(Standards for addition to guide articles..)
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
For articles as they are being built, it is better to have some information than none at all.  The better the standard of the article, and as it grows, the greater the expectation of the standard of edits.  This seem to reflect the reality of what happens here.  Would there be any objections to including a para to this effect in description of guide and star articles? --[[User:Inas|Inas]] 20:32, 8 February 2009 (EST)
 
For articles as they are being built, it is better to have some information than none at all.  The better the standard of the article, and as it grows, the greater the expectation of the standard of edits.  This seem to reflect the reality of what happens here.  Would there be any objections to including a para to this effect in description of guide and star articles? --[[User:Inas|Inas]] 20:32, 8 February 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
:No, i think it's a good idea, as long as it's worded so that it still sounds welcoming to edit the article &ndash; [[User:Cacahuate|<font color="green">cacahuate</font>]]  <sup><small>[[User talk:Cacahuate|<font color="blue">talk</font>]]</small></sup> 21:28, 8 February 2009 (EST)

Revision as of 02:32, 9 February 2009

For reference the old "guide articles needing attention" list has been archived at Wikitravel talk:Guide articles/Guide articles needing attention.

I added {{guidepark}} to the list of guide types thinking that there is such a thing (there is a {{usablepark}}). I think it's a useful difference. Could someone who knows how put together the guidepark template? OldPine 11:18, 14 August 2007 (EDT)

Wait, let me try. OldPine 11:20, 14 August 2007 (EDT)
Template existed, but was just not rewritten for parks. OldPine 11:24, 14 August 2007 (EDT)

Standards for addition to guide articles..

For articles as they are being built, it is better to have some information than none at all. The better the standard of the article, and as it grows, the greater the expectation of the standard of edits. This seem to reflect the reality of what happens here. Would there be any objections to including a para to this effect in description of guide and star articles? --Inas 20:32, 8 February 2009 (EST)

No, i think it's a good idea, as long as it's worded so that it still sounds welcoming to edit the article – cacahuate talk 21:28, 8 February 2009 (EST)

Variants

Actions

Destination Docents

In other languages