Help Wikitravel grow by contributing to an article! Learn how.
New users, please see Help or go to the Pub to ask questions.

Difference between revisions of "Wikitravel:Wikitravel Press"

From Wikitravel
Jump to: navigation, search
(Wikitravel Press)
m (Reverted edits by Dangola (Talk) to last version by Wrh2)
(26 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Wikitravel Press==
+
[http://wikitravelpress.com Wikitravel Press] (WTP) is an independent company that publishes printed guidebooks based on Wikitravel content.  This article covers relations between Wikitravel the website and Wikitravel Press the company.  Please see also the [http://wikitravelpress.com/faq Wikitravel Press FAQ].
  
Today I have the pleasure of unveiling '''[http://wikitravelpress.com Wikitravel Press]''' (WTP), an independent company that will publish printed guidebooks based on Wikitravel content.
+
==Relationship==
 +
Wikitravel Press is a commercial venture operated by [[User:Peterfitzgerald|Peter]], [[User:Jpatokal|Jani]], [[User:Maj|Michele]] and [[User:Evan|Evan]].  [[Wikitravel:Internet Brands|Internet Brands]] has licensed the Wikitravel trademark to the company, but is not managing and does not own the company.  Books are sold at competitive prices (typically US$12-17 plus shipping and other fees), primarily through [http://www.amazon.com/s?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=wikitravel Amazon.com].  Per the Wikitravel copyleft, the books themselves are subject to the same Creative Commons license as Wikitravel Web pages, so they can be copied and reused freely.
  
The model is simple:  text and images will be selected from Wikitravel, combined, abridged or changed by (paid) editors, published on demand and shipped anywhere in the worldThis means that Wikitravel guidebooks will have up-to-date and reliable information, eliminating the infuriating years-long gap between research and publication that inspired Wikitravel itself.   
+
Wikitravel Press hires book editors to assemble relevant and great destination guides, abridge or expand them, and make final copy-editing and fact-checking tasksWhere this work coincides with the Wikitravel manual of style, the work is contributed directly back onto wikitravel.org.   
  
Wikitravel Press is a commercial venture, owned and operated by Jani, Michele and Evan.  Internet Brands has licensed the Wikitravel trademark to the company, but is not managing and does not own the company. Books will be sold at competitive prices (typically US$10-20 plus shipping and other fees), initially through the Web and later through other channels.  Per the Wikitravel copyleft, the books themselves will also be subject to the same Creative Commons license as Wikitravel Web pages, so they can be copied and reused freely. 
+
On related Wikitravel destination guide pages, there are clearly separated links to the wikitravelpress.com site to buy a copy of the book that includes that guideThe placement of these links was [[:shared:Talk:Advertising_policy|extensively discussed]] on Shared, but more input is always welcome.
Wikitravel Press will hire book editors to assemble relevant destination guides, abridge or expand them, and make final copy-editing and fact-checking tasksWhere this work coincides with the Wikitravel manual of style, they'll contribute that work directly back onto wikitravel.org. 
+
  
Book editors may be existing Wikitravellers with exceptional domain knowledge and language and research skills; they may also be professional editors or freelance travel writers.  Book editors will be held to a strict code of conduct in their interactions with other Wikitravel community members.  They ''will not'' have any extra authority of any sort on the website. In particular, they don't get "final say" on any article.
+
==See also==
 +
* [[Wikitravel:3 August 2007]] - original announcement
 +
* [[Wikitravel:1 February 2008]] - public launch of first guides, [http://wikitravelpress.com/books/en/Chicago/ Chicago] and [http://wikitravelpress.com/books/en/Singapore/ Singapore]
  
On related Wikitravel destination guide pages, there will be non-intrusive links to the wikitravelpress.com site to buy a copy of the book that includes that guide.  As usual, input from the community will be an important part of the process in determining the placement of these links. 
 
  
Our expectation is to begin shipping the first titles in the Wikitravel Press travel guide series in Fall 2007.  Our initial books will be pre-assembled; typical books will be city guidebooks, regional guidebooks, and country guidebooks.  Our first books will be in English, but we hope to quickly provide guidebooks in other Wikitravel languages.  In the future we hope to provide "ad hoc" books, so you can assemble a guidebook from several different destinations. 
 
  
Our goal with this announcement is to solicit community feedback on the plan.  What are your expectations for a guidebook based on Wikitravel content?  What would you consider acceptable and unacceptable conduct by a Wikitravel Press book editor?  What kind of guidebooks would you be interested in?  [[User:Jpatokal|Jpatokal]] 21:03, 2 August 2007 (EDT)
 
  
:I just want to jump in and say how excited I am personally about this project. This is a [[Wikitravel:goals and non-goals|goal]] that has been unfulfilled for too long. I hope that printed guidebooks will help the general public see and use the great work that Wikitravellers have done over the last 4 years. Thanks so much to Jani for making this important milestone happen. --[[User:Evan|Evan]] 21:12, 2 August 2007 (EDT)
 
  
::Congratulations, Jani.  This is an awesome venture and I hope you guys do well. -- [[User:Sapphire|Sapphire]] • <small>([[User_talk:Sapphire|Talk]])</small> • 22:19, 2 August 2007 (EDT)
+
{{WikitravelDoc|site}}
  
:::A "normal" guide book costs ($US10-20) too [http://www.amazon.com/Lonely-Planet-Cambodia-Nick-Ray/dp/1740595254/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-9420683-9932164?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1186126600&sr=8-1]. Why do you use the community that way? Now the contributors are slaves - working for your revenues. -- [[User:DerFussi|DerFussi]] 03:45, 3 August 2007 (EDT)
 
  
:::::''Oh, deep in my heart, I do believe,''
+
[[fr:Wikitravel:Wikitravel Press]]
:::::''We shall overcome someday.''  --[[User:Peterfitzgerald|Peter]] <small><sup>[[User_talk:Peterfitzgerald|Talk]]</sup></small> 04:57, 3 August 2007 (EDT)
+
[[ko:Wikitravel:Wikitravel Press]]
 
+
[[sv:Wikitravel:Wikitravel Press]]
:::: This sounds like a brilliant idea! I am looking forward to see the first guidebooks... I am wishing you good luck with your new company! --[[User:Flip666|Flip666]] [[User_talk:Flip666|<sup>writeme!</sup>]] &bull; 04:32, 3 August 2007 (EDT)
+
[[wts:Wikitravel Press/ko]]
 
+
DerFussi -- thanks to the CC by-sa license, I can make a printed guidebook from Wikivoyage content, sell it and take ''all'' the money.  Does that make you my slave?  I'll answer my own question: no, it doesn't, because the ''whole point'' of open content is that it can be freely reused.
+
 
+
Of course we'd love to give away books for free, but printing physical books on paper costs money, print on demand is expensive and we just can't compete with Let's Rough Planet's 100,000-copy print runs on price. Instead, our advantage will be that we're much, much more up-to-date than "traditional" guidebooks.
+
 
+
Those Wikitravellers who opt/are chosen to be editors &mdash; and make no mistake, it will be a ''job'' &mdash; will get paid for their work, and a large part of any future profits from WTP will be plowed back into Wikitravel the website.  I, personally, think that giving people the option to buy printed copies of guides they like is a much friendlier way of funding the site than advertisements or begging for donations. [[User:Jpatokal|Jpatokal]] 05:23, 3 August 2007 (EDT)
+
 
+
DerFussi, you know that according to the license ''you'' can make and sell printed guides too, don't you? -- [[User:Mark|Mark]] 08:52, 3 August 2007 (EDT)
+
 
+
:Previous conversation: [[Wikitravel talk:Non-compliant redistribution#|Theft]] Curious who elected Jpatoka community leader?  [[User:2old|2old]] 10:56, 3 August 2007 (EDT)
+
 
+
::Sorry, I'm not really following you here?  The difference between re-use and theft is following the conditions of the CC by-sa license, and WTP intends to adhere to them scrupulously.  As for "community leader", that wasn't my turn of phrase, but I suppose it's just a fancy way of saying "administrator" and you can find the archives of the nomination process for that [http://wikitravel.org/en/Wikitravel:Administrator_nominations/Archives#User:Jpatokal right here]. [[User:Jpatokal|Jpatokal]] 11:08, 3 August 2007 (EDT)
+
 
+
::::Thank you for clearing up the difference: "is following the conditions of the CC by-sa license", between that and theft. Now I see. I also understand the term "touting". I think you may have delivered a "destructive blow", to Wikitravel. We will see. [[User:2old|2old]] 13:53, 3 August 2007 (EDT)
+
 
+
:::Just throwing out speculative thoughts here... Most people will not to want others to profit from their endeavors. That's human nature, I guess. Sure, there is the CC by sa license, and I'm sure most people would not object to an article or a phrase being reused here and there, but actually seeing their work sold in book format might create a different kind of reaction. If that happens, then the source of edits done by regular contributors may possibly dry up, and the project will fold. A possible way around this might be to make Wikitravel Press a non-profit enterprise. Salaries can be taken and profits plowed back into WT, but anything remaining should not be passed on as profit. Instead, perhaps it can be used to fund charities nominated by contributors. Personally, I don't think contributors will object to that, but I believe that they will feel taken advantage of if their endeavors are used to fund someone's new car or vacation at a beach resort - though perhaps not...  [[User:WindHorse|WindHorse]] 12:07, 3 August 2007 (EDT)
+
::::Windhorse, I'm sure you're right that some people aren't going to get it (witness DerFussi), but the simple fact is that this is what the license is all about.  If Jani wants to print Wikitravel out and sell it good for him!  If you want to print Wikitravel out and sell it good for you!  If either of you make changes in order to bring the articles up to editorial standard then great, you've improved the content and you '''have to contribute it back''' that's the rule.  -- [[User:Mark|Mark]] 17:59, 3 August 2007 (EDT)
+
 
+
::::Just to rephrase, maybe people who don't want to see others profit from their endevours shouldn't get involved in open content projects.  It's the whole point.  Just to remind you there's nothing stopping anybody, anybody from doing this.  It's in the license, and it just proves once again that IB's ownership of the domain has changed nothing. -- [[User:Mark|Mark]] 18:02, 3 August 2007 (EDT)
+
 
+
::::@Mark. I know the license very well. But I do not like the gradual transition of WT to a commercial project and businesses with this modern kind of outsourcing -- [[User:DerFussi|DerFussi]] 12:12, 3 August 2007 (EDT)
+
 
+
:::::Listen DerFussi, I don't understand what you mean by outsourcing.
+
 
+
:::::Here are the facts: sombeody, not the founder of the project, not the owner of the domain, but a long term contributor, one of the most valuable contributors we have, is going to print up Wikitravel in book form and sell the books.  In getting the books into shape he's going to improve the original articles in accordance with the license, meaning that if you don't want a copy of the book you still get the content, and you can always just print it out on a printer if you like.  What exactly is the problem? -- [[User:Mark|Mark]] 17:54, 3 August 2007 (EDT)
+
 
+
: Although we painstakingly try to explain, some people still do not understand the possibilities of our license: There are already people earning money with our work! E.g. [http://www.travelschemer.com/guide/wikitravelguide.aspx?title=germany this] site copies our whole content or [http://www.wordtravels.com/photos/country/Botswana/BW/3 here] a photo made by me is used according to our license. So why should we condemn a member of our community to earn money with Wikitravel, when we allow other people to do so? Besides, and they are even giving back something to the community! --[[User:Flip666|Flip666]] [[User_talk:Flip666|<sup>writeme!</sup>]] &bull; 18:44, 3 August 2007 (EDT)
+
 
+
:: Commercialization, schmercialization. Nobody has addressed the real issue here, namely: in these books, ''what is the ToC going to look like''? What manner of floating, collapsing, whitespace-eating beast slouches toward Montreal/Singapore to be born? [[User:Gorilla Jones|Gorilla Jones]] 19:15, 3 August 2007 (EDT)
+
::::{Insert hysterical laughter}. 8) -- [[User:Sapphire|Sapphire]] • <small>([[User_talk:Sapphire|Talk]])</small> • 01:37, 4 August 2007 (EDT)
+
 
+
::: Horrors! There probably won't even be a three page debate or any vote on that!! Congrats to those in this venture. You deserve any good fortune that follows. [[User:OldPine|OldPine]] 20:23, 3 August 2007 (EDT)
+
 
+
::::Hi Mark, thanks for your comments. I fully agree with you. From a legal and rational point, you are totally correct. However, people are not rational animals, any many may feel that they are offering their efforts for someone else to make a profit. As I stated above, people using the content to print a few articles here and there has a totally different ''feeling'' to someone directly using the work to fund a profit-making book project, even though both are legally within their rights to do so. Don't you think so? I'm not encouraging this reaction or stating it is correct. I'm just pointing out that there could be a backlash, and that Jpatokal should be prepared to deal with it, and that perhaps setting up the venture with a non-profit status could be a way to do so (as well as being an altruistic gesture!) That would be the way I would do it. However, perhaps I'm being too pessimistic as many people have already expressed their support. Personally, I wish Jpatokal well in his venture. He is a good editor and an interesting character [[User:WindHorse|WindHorse]] 21:40, 3 August 2007 (EDT)
+
 
+
:::::I understand your point of view, but Wikitravel Press's core business is selling books at a profit, and this is just not fundamentally compatible with being a non-profit organization.  For example, due to legal/tax issues the Wikimedia Foundation ''cannot'' make more than 10% of its earnings through sales  of any kind, the rest ''has'' to come from donations.  Wikimedia can pull this off because they give away their product for free, but that's not an option for WTP.
+
 
+
:::::All that said, should you happen to know any rich philanthropists who'd just love to fund a Wikitravel Press Foundation, I'm all ears! [[User:Jpatokal|Jpatokal]] 00:56, 4 August 2007 (EDT)
+

Revision as of 16:48, 27 August 2012

Wikitravel Press (WTP) is an independent company that publishes printed guidebooks based on Wikitravel content. This article covers relations between Wikitravel the website and Wikitravel Press the company. Please see also the Wikitravel Press FAQ.

Relationship

Wikitravel Press is a commercial venture operated by Peter, Jani, Michele and Evan. Internet Brands has licensed the Wikitravel trademark to the company, but is not managing and does not own the company. Books are sold at competitive prices (typically US$12-17 plus shipping and other fees), primarily through Amazon.com. Per the Wikitravel copyleft, the books themselves are subject to the same Creative Commons license as Wikitravel Web pages, so they can be copied and reused freely.

Wikitravel Press hires book editors to assemble relevant and great destination guides, abridge or expand them, and make final copy-editing and fact-checking tasks. Where this work coincides with the Wikitravel manual of style, the work is contributed directly back onto wikitravel.org.

On related Wikitravel destination guide pages, there are clearly separated links to the wikitravelpress.com site to buy a copy of the book that includes that guide. The placement of these links was extensively discussed on Shared, but more input is always welcome.

See also

Variants

Actions

Destination Docents

In other languages

other sites