Difference between revisions of "Wikitravel:Votes for deletion"

From Wikitravel
Jump to: navigation, search
m (ack)
Line 460: Line 460:
  
 
I couldn't quite figure out what this is—it seems to either be an establishment or attraction or neighborhood or something in [[Pondicherry]]? Or perhaps it's just a Tamil word. No clue, so I'll lean '''delete''' rather than merge.  --[[User:Peterfitzgerald|Peter]] <small><sup>[[User_talk:Peterfitzgerald|Talk]]</sup></small> 21:10, 19 June 2010 (EDT)
 
I couldn't quite figure out what this is—it seems to either be an establishment or attraction or neighborhood or something in [[Pondicherry]]? Or perhaps it's just a Tamil word. No clue, so I'll lean '''delete''' rather than merge.  --[[User:Peterfitzgerald|Peter]] <small><sup>[[User_talk:Peterfitzgerald|Talk]]</sup></small> 21:10, 19 June 2010 (EDT)
 +
 +
=== [[Www.barcelonapartynights.com]] ===
 +
 +
* '''Speedy delete'''. Spam. --[[User:Globe-trotter|globe-trotter]] 09:43, 20 June 2010 (EDT)

Revision as of 13:47, 20 June 2010


This page contains lists of articles and images which are recommended for deletion. Any Wikitraveller can recommend an article or image for deletion, and any Wikitraveller can comment on the deletion nomination. Articles and images are presumed guilty until proven innocent. After fourteen (14) days of discussion, if a consensus is reached to retain an article, it won't be deleted. Otherwise it will be deleted by an administrator. Please read the Nominating and Commenting sections prior to nominating articles/images or commenting on nominations.

See also:

Contents

Nominating

The basic format for a deletion nomination is the following:

===[[Chicken]]===
* Delete.  Not a valid travel article topic. ~~~~

Please follow these steps when nominating an article or image for deletion:

  1. First read the deletion policy and verify that the article or image really is a candidate for deletion. If you are unsure, bring up the issue on the talk page.
  2. For the article or image being proposed for deletion, add a {{vfd}} tag so that people viewing the article will know that it is proposed for deletion. The {{vfd}} tag must be the very first thing in the article, right at the very top, before everything else.
  3. Add a link to the article or image at the end of the list below, along with the reason why it is being listed for deletion. Sign your vote using four tildes ("~~~~"). List one article or image per entry.
  4. If you're nominating an image for deletion, make sure it's actually located on the English Wikitravel... many images are located on Wikitravel Shared, in which case they should be nominated for deletion over there instead.

Commenting

All Wikitravellers are asked to state their opinion about articles and images listed for deletion. The format for comments is:

===[[Chicken]]===
* '''Delete'''.  Not a valid travel article topic. TravelNut 25:25, 31 Feb 2525 (EDT)
* '''Keep'''.  There is a town in [[Alaska]] called Chicken. ~~~~

When leaving comments:

  1. First read the deletion policy and verify that the article or image really is a candidate for deletion.
  2. You may vote to delete, keep, or redirect the article. If your opinion is that the article should be kept or redirected, please state why. If you are in favor of redirection, you may suggest where it should be redirected to. Sign your vote using four tildes ("~~~~").

Deleting, or not

After fourteen (14) days of discussion, there will probably be consensus one way or the other. If the consensus is to keep, redirect or merge, then any Wikitraveller can do it. If you are redirecting, please remember to check for broken redirects or double redirects as a result of your move. Remove any VFD notices from that page, and archive the deletion discussion as described in the next section.

If the result is delete, then only an administrator can delete. Check if any article links to the image or article in question. After removing those links, delete the image or article. However, if the image is being deleted because it has been moved to the shared repository with the same name, do not remove links to the images, as the links will be automatically be pointed to the shared repository.

Archiving

After you keep/redirect/merge/delete the article, move the deletion discussion to the Archives page for the appropriate month. The root Archives page has a directory. Note that it's the month in which the action was taken, rather than when the nomination was first posted, that should be used for the archived discussion; that way, recourse to the deletion log can lead subsequent readers right to the discussion (at least for the pages that were deleted).

If the nominated article was not deleted, then place another (identical duplicate) copy of the deletion discussion on the talk page of the article being kept or redirected.wts:Votes for deletion


June 2010

Hackberry

A ghost town, population 544. The only thing to see is a handful of abandoned buildings. No place to stay. It hasn't appeared on official Texas highway maps since 1992, and even Google Maps can't find it properly.

  • Any further guidance on which of the two towns to redirect to? Barring further clarification, and based on a five minute search for this place using the Google, I'd lean towards a delete since I'm not sure that a redirect that may or may not be correct would actually be a good thing. -- Ryan • (talk) • 23:21, 16 June 2010 (EDT)

大船

  • Delete. This merge candidate should now go. Do we keep foreign character redirects on en? --inas 04:47, 6 June 2010 (EDT)
Keeping foreign character redirects raises a few issues. They are difficult to patrol on a en site, and there are potentially 20-30 times more redirects to create than there are articles on Wikitravel. Should google hits be a consideration (and I think not) they should be directed to the most appropirate language version, which then has a inter-wiki link to en. --inas 19:07, 8 June 2010 (EDT)
  • Delete. I'm a redirect booster, and do think SEO should be something we take into consideration as long as it doesn't affect website quality, but it's too much to ask of our patrollers to follow the creation of redirects in other character sets. It's awfully hard to tell, for me at least, the difference between @#$%sucker and Tamanrasset, when written in the Arabic script. --Peter Talk 22:14, 9 June 2010 (EDT)
  • Delete With Wikipedia it's not difficult to find many place names in foreign languages by typing in your native language and switching the language and Wikipedia does redirect foreign language entries however, for Wikitravel I think if a traveler's English is not at a level where they can figure out the name of their destination, the guide itself will probably not be so useful. And they can also go to their native language (if it exists) and then click the English version from that page if they need to. ChubbyWimbus 00:49, 11 June 2010 (EDT)

/Zona Centro

  • Delete. Like downtown, this isn't a redirectable thing. --inas 04:48, 6 June 2010 (EDT)

All-American Road

  • Delete. This Wikipedia copied text is encyclopedic in nature. It is is not a destination, not an itinerary, and doesn't make the grade as a travel topic. --inas 04:55, 6 June 2010 (EDT)

Image:Hvar.jpg

Image:Harrisons.JPG

  • Delete. This survived a previous mass-nomination due to not having a license (see Wikitravel:Votes for deletion/April 2008) but it's an image of a business's sign that looks more like advertising than travel content. -- Ryan • (talk) • 12:20, 6 June 2010 (EDT)

Image:My.php?image=philatq8.gif

  • Delete. This survived a previous mass-nomination due to not having a license (see Wikitravel:Votes for deletion/April 2008) but it's unused and the name & image size look suspiciously copyvio-ish. If the consensus is to keep this image then it would need to be de-orphaned in one of the Philadelphia articles. -- Ryan • (talk) • 12:20, 6 June 2010 (EDT)

Image:My.php?image=phillymainpg4.jpg

  • Delete. This survived a previous mass-nomination due to not having a license (see Wikitravel:Votes for deletion/April 2008) but it's unused and the name & image size look suspiciously copyvio-ish. If the consensus is to keep this image then it would need to be de-orphaned in one of the Philadelphia articles. -- Ryan • (talk) • 12:20, 6 June 2010 (EDT)

Image:Pagudpud01.jpg

  • Delete. Unused image that was tagged for VFD in 2008 but apparently never put on the nomination page. -- Ryan • (talk) • 12:20, 6 June 2010 (EDT)

Image:Pagudpud02.jpg

  • Delete. Unused image that was tagged for VFD in 2008 but apparently never put on the nomination page. -- Ryan • (talk) • 12:20, 6 June 2010 (EDT)
  • Delete. Looks likely that it was identified as a non-complying with licence conditions at the time. --inas 23:23, 6 June 2010 (EDT)

Image:Sucree.jpg

  • Delete. Unused image that was tagged for VFD in January 2010 but apparently never put on the nomination page. Looks like a copyvio map. -- Ryan • (talk) • 12:45, 6 June 2010 (EDT)

Image:Abufatin.png

  • Delete. This survived a previous mass-nomination due to not having a license (see Wikitravel:Votes for deletion/April 2008) but it's also an unused image of a person, and thus not appropriate for use here. -- Ryan • (talk) • 12:45, 6 June 2010 (EDT)

Image:Sagada 2.jpg

  • Delete. This survived a previous mass-nomination due to not having a license (see Wikitravel:Votes for deletion/April 2008) but the small image size and user contribution history look suspiciously copyvio-ish. -- Ryan • (talk) • 12:45, 6 June 2010 (EDT)

Image:Europe 1.jpg

  • Delete. This survived a previous mass-nomination due to not having a license (see Wikitravel:Votes for deletion/April 2008) but it's an unused Europe region map, and unused images should be deleted per policy. -- Ryan • (talk) • 12:45, 6 June 2010 (EDT)
  • Delete per above, can't see us having any use of this, and should be on shared anyway --Stefan (sertmann) talk 17:58, 8 June 2010 (EDT)

Image:01monuments1.jpg

  • Delete. This survived a previous mass-nomination due to not having a license (see Wikitravel:Votes for deletion/April 2008) but the small image size and user contribution history look suspiciously copyvio-ish. -- Ryan • (talk) • 12:45, 6 June 2010 (EDT)

Image:S43 YADAGIRIGUTTA TEMPLE1.jpg

  • Delete. Thumbnail image with no license specified, and it's not a high enough quality image that I think we need to keep it around and risk violating copyright. -- Ryan • (talk) • 12:45, 6 June 2010 (EDT)

Bondla Wildlife Sanctuary

I interpret the major attraction, being a high hurdle to get over, so we avoid creating redirects for every zoo and garden on the globe. How do we decide? --inas 19:03, 8 June 2010 (EDT)
I disagree; redirects are cheap, so I don't see the hurdle as very significant. We should avoid creating redirects willy-nilly in any case, but as long as the page exists, and someone took the time to write what's really a decent article on the place, I see little harm in redirecting (especially after a merge, for attribution purposes if nothing else). We should be cautious about minor commercial attractions, of course. LtPowers 10:01, 9 June 2010 (EDT)
My concern isn't so much with the redirect, which as you say is cheap, but rather with redirecting a minor commercial attraction. I don't doubt its commercial - it isn't a santuary or a national park, it is a zoo. As to whether it qualifies as major, not sure, but the google hits are a couple of orders of magnitude below any other zoo I could think of. I certainly see the major attraction hurdle high enough that most commercial attractions wouldn't qualify for redirects, only exceptional or widely known ones. --inas 02:57, 11 June 2010 (EDT)
Well, it's what, 8 square kilometers? More than twice the size of Central Park. =) I would say it's certainly one of the major attractions in or around Goa, commercial or not. LtPowers 09:40, 12 June 2010 (EDT)

Egypt Air

nominations for Turkish Airlines and LAN Airlines moved to separate nomination, per policy (Ryan • (talk) • 12:50, 19 June 2010 (EDT))

Almost empty article, not really sure what to do with it, so I decided to place it here. I don't see any use for it, so I think deleting is the best option.

Unsure, I could see the use of these articles, but other sites probably does a lot better job at it than we ever could. --Stefan (sertmann) talk 17:58, 8 June 2010 (EDT)
  • Delete. Stub that hasn't gotten a significant edit in over a year. -- Ryan • (talk) • 12:54, 19 June 2010 (EDT)

Turkish Airlines

separated from the Egypt Air nomination, per policy (Ryan • (talk) • 12:50, 19 June 2010 (EDT))

Almost empty article, not really sure what to do with it, so I decided to place it here. I don't see any use for it, so I think deleting is the best option.

Unsure, I could see the use of these articles, but other sites probably does a lot better job at it than we ever could. --Stefan (sertmann) talk 17:58, 8 June 2010 (EDT)

LAN Airlines

separated from the Egypt Air nomination, per policy (Ryan • (talk) • 12:50, 19 June 2010 (EDT))

Almost empty article, not really sure what to do with it, so I decided to place it here. I don't see any use for it, so I think deleting is the best option.

Unsure, I could see the use of these articles, but other sites probably does a lot better job at it than we ever could. --Stefan (sertmann) talk 17:58, 8 June 2010 (EDT)

Hiking in Czech Republic and Hong Kong Hiking

I have nothing against hiking, but these two articles are almost completely empty. --globe-trotter 17:40, 8 June 2010 (EDT)

  • Keep me, let them stay, valid topics, and someone might get inspired. --Stefan (sertmann) talk 17:58, 8 June 2010 (EDT)
  • Delete. If someone has something to say, they can create and article and say it, or possibly add it to the main article. Creating stubs for everywhere you can hike prior to information being available there doesn't add any value. This article was created by anon 18 months ago. This was their only edit, and they haven't added any content. --inas 18:59, 8 June 2010 (EDT)
  • Delete both since neither have received a substantial edit in over a year, and per policy stub itineraries get deleted after a year if they receive no further edits. As an aside, it is helpful to have one nomination per article (unless they are copies of one another) as it is awkward to potentially have to argue to keep one and delete another. -- Ryan • (talk) • 12:42, 19 June 2010 (EDT)

Image:La oropendola.jpg

  • Delete. A VFD tags was added to this in 2007 but it never went on a nomination page and there isn't any indication of why the VFD tag was added. That said, it's currently unused and site policy is that orphaned images should be deleted. If anyone feels that this should be kept please be sure to indicate what article it can be placed in. -- Ryan • (talk) • 00:08, 9 June 2010 (EDT)

Image:Chopta3.jpg

  • Delete. This survived a previous mass-nomination due to not having a license (see Wikitravel:Votes for deletion/April 2008) but it's currently unused and site policy is that orphaned images should be deleted. If anyone feels that this should be kept please be sure to indicate what article it can be placed in. -- Ryan • (talk) • 00:08, 9 June 2010 (EDT)

Image:DSCF0023.JPG

  • Delete. This survived a previous mass-nomination due to not having a license (see Wikitravel:Votes for deletion/April 2008) but it's a poor quality image of two people swimming - I don't think it's worth keeping around. -- Ryan • (talk) • 00:08, 9 June 2010 (EDT)

Image:EasyRiderTour.jpg

  • Delete. This survived a previous mass-nomination due to not having a license (see Wikitravel:Votes for deletion/April 2008) but it's a poor quality image that was uploaded to promote a bike tour operator, something we typically discourage. -- Ryan • (talk) • 00:08, 9 June 2010 (EDT)

Image:Mezquita.jpg

  • Delete. This survived a previous mass-nomination due to not having a license (see Wikitravel:Votes for deletion/April 2008) but it's currently unused and site policy is that orphaned images should be deleted. If anyone feels that this should be kept please be sure to indicate what article it can be placed in. -- Ryan • (talk) • 00:08, 9 June 2010 (EDT)

Image:Asia 2006 089.jpg

  • Delete. This survived a previous mass-nomination due to not having a license (see Wikitravel:Votes for deletion/April 2008) but it's currently unused and site policy is that orphaned images should be deleted. If anyone feels that this should be kept please be sure to indicate what article it can be placed in. -- Ryan • (talk) • 00:08, 9 June 2010 (EDT)

Image:Harrisons.jpg

Polish National Parks

When we deleted the Poland articles (see here: [1]), we forgot this one.

Delete. --globe-trotter 10:50, 9 June 2010 (EDT)

Learning Spanish abroad

  • Delete. stub travel topic. vfd once before in 2007. Argument given at that time was that it should be given the opportunity to develop. Three years later, it still states the bleedin' obvious, that some people go to Spain to learn Spanish. Really difficult to see how this article can develop, and previous suggestion that this could compare Spanish courses in Argentina to those in Spain seems wildly optimistic. --inas 20:12, 10 June 2010 (EDT)
  • Delete Traveling to a country that speaks the language you want to learn is a no-brainer certainly not specific to Spanish, and ranking Spanish courses by country doesn't seem helpful when there is a lot of variation in the quality of courses within countries. ChubbyWimbus 18:07, 12 June 2010 (EDT)

Literary travel

  • Delete. another stub travel topic going nowhere. Difficult to see how this can every be more than a list of books - there are so many literary paths to follow, many of which may make good itineraries - but is there something separate to literary tourism that we can explore here? If this one gets discovered by the walking tour brigade, they will have a field day. --inas 20:14, 10 June 2010 (EDT)
  • Delete If we had enough literary guides, an index could be useful, but I don't think we have any and trying to make this page itself an itinerary is impossible. It's just too broad. ChubbyWimbus 00:40, 11 June 2010 (EDT)
  • Oppose In a recent discussion, I was warranted that we effectively don't delete any minimally useful travel topics at all, especially if there's an active contributor patrolling new contributors. But we do? --DenisYurkin 03:37, 11 June 2010 (EDT)
There was discussion and a recent policy change on deletion specific to itineraries here [2]. As far as "active contributor patrolling new contributors", I think it's safe to say we've given the creator of this article plenty of time to develop it. It's been over 2 years and the only change that has been made to the article was a capitalization update, so I don't think anyone is being bullied by deleting this. Also, it's extremely broad. If someone created a Little House on the Prairie itinerary, I could envision it becoming something. There are many sites related to the books and author however, "literary travel" as a single topic includes every book ever written, which cannot possibly make a sensible itinerary. ChubbyWimbus 04:32, 11 June 2010 (EDT)
DenisYurkin - are you arguing there is some policy reason to keep this? I don't see that in the discussion you pointed to. If you think the article can be usefully expanded, then explain why, and we can keep it. If it can't be usefully expanded it should go. --inas 23:56, 11 June 2010 (EDT)
Not a policy, but a status-quo described under the link which I read as "we are very conservative in deleting travel topics":
There have been very few travel topics (or other articles) deleted - even the ones that are obviously complete and absolute rubbish we debate endlessly in vfd. If there has been a travel topic deleted that someone expressed an interest in curating, I must have missed it.
I believe that much more books exist that each makes it an interesting undertaking to travel on its keys places mentioned. And listing such things is absolutely valid "alternative way of seeing travel". --DenisYurkin 15:59, 13 June 2010 (EDT)
I'm not sure there is much to say about this in terms of subtopics, like "how to prepare for literary travel", but if we keep this, I think we should give it a little more structure than those random examples that we don't even have articles about. I agree that it's a valid type of travel, but what do we have to put there? Looking through our itineraries, Literary London and maybe Narrow Road to the Deep North would be valid entries. We could probably add Momotaro if folktales count as literary travel... What do we think we want from this article? Where do you see it going? ChubbyWimbus 18:15, 13 June 2010 (EDT)

Lake Titicaca

  • Redirect. Is this an attraction or a region? I think it is essentially an attraction, and should redirected. However, it may be a region of islands, in which case we should probably rename it to Lake Titicaca Islands to avoid possible confusion. I understand this is a bit of an unorthodox vfd, but I know there are views on what to do with these sorts of articles, so I think this makes a better place than the article talk page. --inas 21:35, 10 June 2010 (EDT)

IMO, it's a valid region article, although the article needs the rest of the section headers. Since there is no clear deletion rationale here, I don't think a vfd is appropriate. The vfd page is a magnet for controversy & barn burners, as it is the only page where we do not follow Wikitravel:Consensus strictly. Accordingly, I think this discussion would be better suited to the article's talk page. If we can't figure out what to do with bodies of water as regions, that's something that will need to be resolved via policy discussion and consensus before we can safely use the vfd process. --Peter Talk 13:21, 11 June 2010 (EDT)

There seems to be enough islands in the Lake to make it a reasonable region article. I prefer the current title over Lake Titicaca Islands, but if it needs to be moved, it's not a big deal. ChubbyWimbus 16:02, 11 June 2010 (EDT)
We have a clear policy on bodies of water. The first line of our policy states We don't write destination guide articles about bodies of water. This is a destination guide about a body of water. I understand this issue is contentions, but it really is down to anyone who thinks we should have destination guides about bodies of water, to build the consensus to change it. There is a clear deletion rationale for an article about a body of water, like this one is. However, in line with our deletion policy, articles about major attractions should be redirected.
I accept that a valid region guide may one day be created for this region, and I wouldn't object to that. Right now we are dealing with an article that is not a region, but rather about an attraction, and the attraction information should be moved, and the article redirected. --inas 19:35, 11 June 2010 (EDT)
And following that line is Some land regions are named after bodies of water. These articles aren't about those bodies of water, and this style guideline does not apply to them. For example, the Lake Tahoe region in California is named after the lake there, but it is about the towns, national parks, and ski resorts that ring the lake. We should have a guide to Lake Titicaca, and it should of course focus on the towns and relevant islands, rather than the water itself. The fact that the article is currently a stub is not a deletion rationale, and how to fix it up is a question for the talk page. A merge & redirect doesn't make sense—would you copy the information about the "attraction" to each and every town on the lake?
There is contention about the bodies of water policy, what it means, and how to apply it, and the vfd page is a bad place to hash it out. --Peter Talk 23:34, 11 June 2010 (EDT)
I've no intention of arguing the ins and outs of the bodies of water policy here.
This article is about an attraction, and like any other attraction it should be merged and redirected. We do this for every other attraction - even ones which can be reached from several places. The author of the text surely had no intention of creating an article about a region. If you want to make this article about something else, a region, or whatever - then by all means go ahead, however in general I would argue for a more methodological approach to regioning, rather than taking attraction articles and applying a region template to them. --inas 23:50, 11 June 2010 (EDT)

Mamori River

  • Delete. Another stub, being attacked as part of our housekeeping effort. This one was originally added by a tour guide running tours from Manaus. Since hijacked by another tour operator also running tours from that city. There are so many bits of water in the vicinity of Manaus that can be reached by tour, the value of keeping this content seems low, and only seems to promote the tour operators going there. The onlly mention of this destination on google is wikitravel and its followers, which always makes me a bit sus. --inas 23:54, 10 June 2010 (EDT)
The article says it is a "nature reserve". If it is, I assume it is actually part of a larger area with a name that is not just the river? If it does indeed sit in a nature reserve, we could create a page for the reserve and redirect to it. ChubbyWimbus 16:05, 11 June 2010 (EDT)

Mexican National Parks

  • Delete. It's empty and hasn't been edited since 2007-8. --globe-trotter 06:46, 12 June 2010 (EDT)
  • Delete. I think the guidelines on stub topics/itineraries that haven't received an edit in a year is applicable. -- Ryan • (talk) • 13:05, 12 June 2010 (EDT)

Renting a car in the U.S.

  • Delete. Very badly written article and even seems to be a copyvio. --globe-trotter 08:10, 12 June 2010 (EDT)
  • Delete. A no-brainer for me. -- Sapphire(Talk) • 17:37, 13 June 2010 (EDT)

Diving in Thailand/Contacts

  • Delete. This is a yellow page listing of dive operators in Thailand, something that is an explicit non-goal of Wikitravel. Given that there is almost no useful information about the operators besides address and contact number I don't think this even merits a merge. -- Ryan • (talk) • 18:15, 12 June 2010 (EDT)
  • Delete. I'm just cleaning up a ton of SEO spam from this user.... — D. Guillaime 20:42, 12 June 2010 (EDT)

Ko Lanta Dive Guide

  • Delete. Very similar to the above, in fact, and not convincingly a valid article. — D. Guillaime 20:42, 12 June 2010 (EDT)
Let me see what I can salvage from it to relevant sites first. --Peter (Southwood) Talk 08:42, 13 June 2010 (EDT)
Has this article been lockes somehow? I am unable to edit it. -- Peter (Southwood) Talk 09:07, 13 June 2010 (EDT)
No, there's nothing in the protection log. Do you get an error message of some sort? LtPowers 11:10, 13 June 2010 (EDT)
  • Weak keep. If the user who created this guide was not plastering his/her company URL all across our site I think this would be a clear keep - much of the information is pretty good - but the article should not be used as a promotional tool for any particular company. -- Ryan • (talk) • 13:39, 13 June 2010 (EDT)
  • Merge into Ko Lanta, Ko Phi Phi, Ko Ngai, etc. --globe-trotter 05:01, 14 June 2010 (EDT)

Image:Tatra.jpg

  • Delete. Orphaned, tagged as a copyvio, and VFD'd in 2007 but never placed on the VFD page. -- Ryan • (talk) • 02:30, 13 June 2010 (EDT)

Image:BrezinaHotel.jpg

  • Delete. Orphaned, tagged as a copyvio, and VFD'd in 2007 but never placed on the VFD page. -- Ryan • (talk) • 02:30, 13 June 2010 (EDT)

Image:64yog.jpg

  • Delete. Tagged as a copyvio, and VFD'd in 2007 but never placed on the VFD page. -- Ryan • (talk) • 02:30, 13 June 2010 (EDT)

Image:Bergen from fløyen1.jpg

  • Delete. Tagged VFD in 2007 but never nominated. I'm not sure why this was VFD'd, but it's currently unused and thus should be deleted per policy. -- Ryan • (talk) • 02:30, 13 June 2010 (EDT)

Image:Dickens poster.jpg

Image:A109pc.jpg

  • Delete. This survived a previous mass-nomination due to not having a license (see Wikitravel:Votes for deletion/April 2008) but it's unused and thus subject to deletion per policy. If anyone wants to keep it please specify what article it can be incorporated into. -- Ryan • (talk) • 02:30, 13 June 2010 (EDT)

Image:SanAndres.jpg

Image:Sari.jpg

  • Delete. This survived a previous mass-nomination due to not having a license (see Wikitravel:Votes for deletion/April 2008) but it's unused, of poor quality, and looks like just a generic sea image so I have no idea how we could use it. If anyone wants to keep it please indicate what article it could be used in. -- Ryan • (talk) • 11:59, 13 June 2010 (EDT)

Image:Sari .jpg

  • Delete. This survived a previous mass-nomination due to not having a license (see Wikitravel:Votes for deletion/April 2008) but it's unused and there is no indication of where it was taken. If anyone wants to keep it please indicate what article it could be used in. -- Ryan • (talk) • 11:59, 13 June 2010 (EDT)

Image:IMG 0132.JPG

  • Delete. This survived a previous mass-nomination due to not having a license (see Wikitravel:Votes for deletion/April 2008) but it's unused, blurry, and of rocks and a lake with no indication of where it was taken. If anyone wants to keep it please indicate what article it could be used in. -- Ryan • (talk) • 11:59, 13 June 2010 (EDT)

Image:14-1-. bench in the shade (2).jpg

  • Delete. This survived a previous mass-nomination due to not having a license (see Wikitravel:Votes for deletion/April 2008) but it's unused and there is no indication of where it was taken. If anyone wants to keep it please indicate what article it could be used in. -- Ryan • (talk) • 11:59, 13 June 2010 (EDT)

Image:Back.jpg

  • Delete. This survived a previous mass-nomination due to not having a license (see Wikitravel:Votes for deletion/April 2008) but it's unused and there is no indication of where it was taken. If anyone wants to keep it please indicate what article it could be used in. -- Ryan • (talk) • 11:59, 13 June 2010 (EDT)

Image:Tazza.jpg

  • Delete. This survived a previous mass-nomination due to not having a license (see Wikitravel:Votes for deletion/April 2008), however it's a commercial photo of the inside of a bar in Providence, something we don't usually allow unless the establishment is notable for some reason. -- Ryan • (talk) • 11:59, 13 June 2010 (EDT)

Image:3steeple.jpg

  • Delete. This survived a previous mass-nomination due to not having a license (see Wikitravel:Votes for deletion/April 2008), however it's a commercial photo of the inside of a bar in Providence, something we don't usually allow unless the establishment is notable for some reason. -- Ryan • (talk) • 11:59, 13 June 2010 (EDT)

Image:Heavenmetro.jpg

Image:Skyline.jpg

  • Delete. This survived a previous mass-nomination due to not having a license (see Wikitravel:Votes for deletion/April 2008) but it's unused. If anyone wants to keep it please incorporate it into the Baku article. -- Ryan • (talk) • 11:59, 13 June 2010 (EDT)

Image:Afbeelding buitengevel la oropendola verweg 001 correctie.jpg

  • Delete. This was VFD'd in 2007 for unknown reasons but never added to the nominations page. It's unused, so if anyone wants to keep it please indicate what article it could be used in. -- Ryan • (talk) • 11:59, 13 June 2010 (EDT)

Image:Bhattathiri.jpg

  • Delete. This survived a previous mass-nomination due to not having a license (see Wikitravel:Votes for deletion/April 2008) but it's an unused picture of a person and thus a pretty clear case for deletion. -- Ryan • (talk) • 12:02, 13 June 2010 (EDT)

Image:Saffron Coffee.jpg

  • Delete. Nominated in 2007 but apparently never placed on the nominations page. This is an unused ad for a coffee company with no travel value. -- Ryan • (talk) • 11:59, 13 June 2010 (EDT)

Image:Klagenfurt.jpg

Colonia (island)

  • Delete. VFD tag was added in 2009 indicating that it doesn't seem to be a real place. -- Ryan • (talk) • 11:59, 13 June 2010 (EDT)

Cliffe

  • Redirect. This was tagged VFD in February 2010 but apparently not placed on the nomination page. I don't know where to redirect to, but from the talk page: "This is best treated under GET OUT in Chatham and/or Rochester pages. It does not seem to have an hotel or much to see." -- Ryan • (talk) • 11:59, 13 June 2010 (EDT)

Tel Aviv/Hatikva

  • Redirect to Tel Aviv or the appropriate district. This was tagged VFD in 2008 but apparently never nominated. It doesn't fit within the Tel Aviv district structure which (I assume) was why it was nominated. -- Ryan • (talk) • 12:50, 13 June 2010 (EDT)

Image:Coakers walk.jpg

  • Delete. Tagged VFD in 2008 but not nominated, it's an unused image of two people with no travel value, so a clear delete. -- Ryan • (talk) • 12:50, 13 June 2010 (EDT)
  • Delete, recognizable faces. --globe-trotter 14:16, 13 June 2010 (EDT)

Madrid/Pickpockets

  • Delete. Tagged VFD in 2008 but not nominated. The info in the article seems to be based on one person's account of being robbed, so probably not worth merging. -- Ryan • (talk) • 12:50, 13 June 2010 (EDT)
  • Delete. --globe-trotter 14:14, 13 June 2010 (EDT)
  • Speedy delete. I agree with Ryan. -- Sapphire(Talk) • 17:39, 13 June 2010 (EDT)
  • Delete Was the the deleted image an actual picture of the pickpockets?? Send it over to WikiCops ChubbyWimbus 18:33, 13 June 2010 (EDT)

Kololo Game Reserve

  • Delete. Tagged VFD in March 2010 but apparently never nominated. The game reserve is a listing in Limpopo, which is sufficient. -- Ryan • (talk) • 12:50, 13 June 2010 (EDT)


Seoul districts

The following articles from Seoul districts have been created, but Seoul does not yet have a district structure. I do think it'll need them eventually, but for now I'd suggest to delete them:

  • Delete. --globe-trotter 10:54, 15 June 2010 (EDT)
  • Redirect. Is there a reason why they can't just be redirected to Seoul? If they are actual districts then the Wikitravel:Deletion policy states that a redirect is preferable to deletion. -- Ryan • (talk) • 11:12, 15 June 2010 (EDT)
  • Yes, redirect is fine, my mistake. --globe-trotter 11:27, 15 June 2010 (EDT)
  • Redirect. Incidentally, I do hope someone who knows the city can put in some work to fill in more info and get it districtified at some point. The article even states that by some measures it is second in size only to Tokyo, so it sorely needs expansion and districtification. Visiting Seoul using only the guide we have now could really be somewhat of a pain in the ass. Texugo 19:45, 15 June 2010 (EDT)
  • Merge & redirect. Also, IWBN to document the current ad hoc district structure, as it might perhaps be useful as a starting point for a districtification. Seoul does badly need districting. --Peter Talk 22:25, 16 June 2010 (EDT)

Idre Fjäll

  • Delete. Semi-orphaned and non-useful stub about what seems like a large hotel—not even a collection of resorts side by side. Should be covered in Idre article, which is yet to be created. – Vidimian 15:26, 16 June 2010 (EDT)

Rai nivas

I couldn't quite figure out what this is—it seems to either be an establishment or attraction or neighborhood or something in Pondicherry? Or perhaps it's just a Tamil word. No clue, so I'll lean delete rather than merge. --Peter Talk 21:10, 19 June 2010 (EDT)

Www.barcelonapartynights.com