Difference between revisions of "Wikitravel:Requests for comment"

From Wikitravel
Jump to: navigation, search
(Attacking the Tech backlog: Roadmap redesigned; needs new round of voting)
(rmv old requests, move India question to Articles)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
* IsPartOf is coming soon to a district article near you.  Do you care?  If so, have your say at [[Wikitravel talk:RDF Expedition#RDF/IsPartOf, are we serious, do we need it on districts?]]  --[[User:Inas|inas]] 08:51, 17 September 2009 (EDT)
 
* IsPartOf is coming soon to a district article near you.  Do you care?  If so, have your say at [[Wikitravel talk:RDF Expedition#RDF/IsPartOf, are we serious, do we need it on districts?]]  --[[User:Inas|inas]] 08:51, 17 September 2009 (EDT)
 
   
 
   
* [[User:Ravikiran_r/Dividing India]] - does it make sense? Was there a confusion in the first place, or was it entirely in my head? Please comment on the talk page. — [[User:Ravikiran r|Ravikiran]] 23:14, 21 August 2009 (EDT)
 
 
 
* We seem very close to establishing a basis for some policy on car rental agency listings in at [[Wikitravel talk:External links#Car rental agencies again]].  Please comment --[[User:Inas|inas]] 19:25, 6 August 2009 (EDT)
 
* We seem very close to establishing a basis for some policy on car rental agency listings in at [[Wikitravel talk:External links#Car rental agencies again]].  Please comment --[[User:Inas|inas]] 19:25, 6 August 2009 (EDT)
  
 
* [[Wikitravel talk:Fellow Traveller Expedition#An Open Invitation for Extlinks]].  Does this wikitravel page reflect today's reality? What is this page for? -- [[User:Cjensen|Colin]] 23:58, 1 June 2009 (EDT)
 
* [[Wikitravel talk:Fellow Traveller Expedition#An Open Invitation for Extlinks]].  Does this wikitravel page reflect today's reality? What is this page for? -- [[User:Cjensen|Colin]] 23:58, 1 June 2009 (EDT)
 
* [[Wikitravel_talk:How_to_handle_unwanted_edits#Range_blocks]] - Should we enable this tool? (Regardless of how we decide to govern it with policy.)
 
  
 
* Other Wikis are using CC-by-SA 2.0 or 3.0 licenses. Is this compatible with our 1.0? If not, can we fix that? Discussion at [[:shared:Tech:License upgrade]]. [[User:Pashley|Pashley]] 08:05, 23 December 2007 (EST)
 
* Other Wikis are using CC-by-SA 2.0 or 3.0 licenses. Is this compatible with our 1.0? If not, can we fix that? Discussion at [[:shared:Tech:License upgrade]]. [[User:Pashley|Pashley]] 08:05, 23 December 2007 (EST)
Line 22: Line 18:
 
* [[:shared:Talk:Advertising policy|Talk:Advertising policy]] &mdash; an important discussion dedicated to drafting a policy for ads on Wikitravel that everyone should be aware of and take part in.  [[User:Peterfitzgerald|Peter]] <small><sup>[[User_talk:Peterfitzgerald|Talk]]</sup></small> 17:57, 10 January 2008 (EST)
 
* [[:shared:Talk:Advertising policy|Talk:Advertising policy]] &mdash; an important discussion dedicated to drafting a policy for ads on Wikitravel that everyone should be aware of and take part in.  [[User:Peterfitzgerald|Peter]] <small><sup>[[User_talk:Peterfitzgerald|Talk]]</sup></small> 17:57, 10 January 2008 (EST)
  
* [[Wikitravel_talk:Big_city_article_template#Learn and Work]] - building consensus for what should be contained within the ''Learn'' section of an article.  Is this section a list of universities in the area, a list of short courses a traveller can take, or something else?  --[[User:Inas|Inas]] 18:40, 22 March 2009 (EDT)
 
 
* [[Wikitravel talk:Sock puppets]] - a proposal for a new policy, as of yet very limited in scope.  --[[User:Peterfitzgerald|Peter]] <small><sup>[[User_talk:Peterfitzgerald|Talk]]</sup></small> 01:02, 31 March 2009 (EDT)
 
  
 
==Articles==
 
==Articles==
  
* [[Rail_travel_in_India]] - Article was marked for merge in December 2006, discussion ended without a decision in October 2008. Just thinking it might be time to decide the fate of this article once and for all, so have started talk section at [[Talk:Rail_travel_in_India#Decision_time.3F]] [[User:Nrms|Nrms]] 05:34, 2 May 2009 (EDT)
+
* [[User:Ravikiran_r/Dividing India]] - does it make sense? Was there a confusion in the first place, or was it entirely in my head? Please comment on the talk page. &mdash; [[User:Ravikiran r|Ravikiran]] 23:14, 21 August 2009 (EDT)
  
 
==Attacking the Tech backlog==
 
==Attacking the Tech backlog==

Revision as of 22:02, 23 September 2009

This page is for requests of additional feedback on difficulties and disputes in Wikitravel, including both policy/style pages as well as actual article content.

Add links to disputed articles below in the appropriate section. Please don't start up conversations here; the point of this page is to direct Wikitravellers' attention to a discussion going on elsewhere. Please sign and date your request.

Requests pointing to discussions that have gone dormant for over two months will be removed from this page. Otherwise, the original contributor may remove his/her request when satisfied. (Please remember to do this, in order to keep the page clean!)

Policy

  • Other Wikis are using CC-by-SA 2.0 or 3.0 licenses. Is this compatible with our 1.0? If not, can we fix that? Discussion at shared:Tech:License upgrade. Pashley 08:05, 23 December 2007 (EST)
I'm renewing this rfc, despite it's having gone dead, just since it's an important discussion and people should be able to find it easily. --Peter Talk 05:08, 4 June 2008 (EDT)
  • Talk:Advertising policy — an important discussion dedicated to drafting a policy for ads on Wikitravel that everyone should be aware of and take part in. Peter Talk 17:57, 10 January 2008 (EST)


Articles

  • User:Ravikiran_r/Dividing India - does it make sense? Was there a confusion in the first place, or was it entirely in my head? Please comment on the talk page. — Ravikiran 23:14, 21 August 2009 (EDT)

Attacking the Tech backlog

  • shared:Top bugs — I'm not sure that everyone realizes that this article exists, but it is a very important one and more contributions would be very welcome. --Peter Talk 16:47, 17 January 2008 (EST)
  • shared:Roadmap#Nominations — Analogous to the top bugs, where we can vote for our preferred prioritization of feature requests. So show up and vote! If the process is confusing, hanging chads, etc., talk to me. --Peter Talk 13:50, 20 March 2008 (EDT)
Bump. I've just redone the Roadmap's format to make it more user-friendly (and hopefully more effective). It will require that votes be cast anew—please stop by to vote for one–two of the most important/urgent requests. --Peter Talk 17:56, 23 September 2009 (EDT)