Beautiful banners are coming to every article and you can help!
Check out our guidelines and learn how to create your own!

Difference between revisions of "Wikitravel:Be fair"

From Wikitravel
Jump to: navigation, search
(renamed and slightly rewritten)
(see also)
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
OK, well, it's not 100% true that we don't have '''any''' agenda on Wikitravel. We have [[Wikitravel:goals and non-goals|goals]], and we mean to achieve them. We want to make a really, really, really good travel guide that's useful  and readable for travellers worldwide. We want to share our knowledge, and have it used. Maintaining these goals in mind, we can see where leaving extraneous non-travel ideologies behind is in our best interest. We want to make a travel guide, not a religious tract that scares away readers before they get through the first sentence.
 
OK, well, it's not 100% true that we don't have '''any''' agenda on Wikitravel. We have [[Wikitravel:goals and non-goals|goals]], and we mean to achieve them. We want to make a really, really, really good travel guide that's useful  and readable for travellers worldwide. We want to share our knowledge, and have it used. Maintaining these goals in mind, we can see where leaving extraneous non-travel ideologies behind is in our best interest. We want to make a travel guide, not a religious tract that scares away readers before they get through the first sentence.
 +
 +
==See also==
 +
* [[Wikitravel:Avoid negative reviews|Avoid negative reviews]], as some places are best ignored
 +
* [[Wikitravel:Don't tout|Don't tout]], as some places don't live up to reality
 +
* [[Wikitravel:Tone|Tone]], for how to strike a happy compromise
  
 
[[de:Wikitravel:Neutraler Standpunkt]]
 
[[de:Wikitravel:Neutraler Standpunkt]]

Revision as of 09:18, 30 April 2006

Wikitravel makes every attempt to be fair in articles.

Being "fair" does not necessarily mean being "nice". We have a mission to make (among other things) a reliable and complete travel guide; a travel guide that doesn't give qualitative information about the things it describes isn't reliable or complete.

We need to call a spade a spade; if a restaurant is crowded, loud, and overpriced, we need to say so. If a hotel has bugs or smells like urine or is dangerously badly built, we need to say so. If a tourist site is ugly, annoying, or not worth the effort, we need to say so.

If another Wikitraveller disagrees, the description should be edited until both sides agree that the description is fair. If a restaurant's pizzas are tasty and served fast one day, and half-raw despite a one-hour wait the next, then an example of a fair description would be that service can be slow and quality suffers during rush hour.

However, being "fair" doesn't mean using bland, empty, vapid, or timorous prose. Wikitravellers should feel free — nay, obligated — to use concrete, lively descriptions that paint a clear, concise picture of the subject in question. "Greek restaurant just off the plaza" doesn't tell anyone anything. "Dingy but passable Greek restaurant with surly waitstaff, rich and generous portions of moussaka, tinny stereo system" gives a lot more info. You don't have to tone down your writing in Wikitravel just to remain fair.

The idea of "being fair" is this: we don't have any agenda on Wikitravel. We are not advocating any religion, political philosophy, environmental practice, feminist theory, international language, home cooking device, tour company, or other ideas, businesses or causes. We aren't trying to put any hotel out of business or punish any restaurant because they wouldn't run our expired Diners' Club card. We are trying to put personal feelings about destinations behind us, while sharing our knowledge and impressions with other Wikitravellers.

OK, well, it's not 100% true that we don't have any agenda on Wikitravel. We have goals, and we mean to achieve them. We want to make a really, really, really good travel guide that's useful and readable for travellers worldwide. We want to share our knowledge, and have it used. Maintaining these goals in mind, we can see where leaving extraneous non-travel ideologies behind is in our best interest. We want to make a travel guide, not a religious tract that scares away readers before they get through the first sentence.

See also

Variants

Actions

Destination Docents

In other languages