User talk:Wrh2/Archive 2010
I'm new to editing pages here so apologies up front for any mistakes! I've used wikitravel for a while and it has been a great resource for my travels so I decided to contribute about my local area (Blue Mountains Australia). I put in a link to a great website that I've been showing friends which has aerial video of the mountains and I used it to track down some great places to see views that as a local I didn't even know about. Within minutes my link was deleted. I don't quite understand. the link has has no ads or anything commercial and seeing the Mountains from the air is great! What goes here? Why are you deleting such a good resource? I don't really feel much like contributing anymore but it has been so good so far I just want to find out what I have done wrong. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 188.8.131.52 (talk • contribs)
External Link Policy - Oahu page
Yes I can see the need to keep spam links out. But removing a single link on a page that contains dozens of external links seems silly. Why not remove them all while you're at it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mrs esterhauzen (talk • contribs)
Also - Here's another problem. People lift information from other travel web sites, and then summarize that data into Wikipedia. For example - the external link you removed on the Oahu page was the source of information for the sentence explaining how many tourist beaches Oahu has. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mrs esterhauzen (talk • contribs)
Yup, I realise all that. I do prefer to follow the policy and leave a meessage first though, even to an anonymous IP. If there is another infringement after the message has been left, then to the blacklist it goes (at least, that is my interpretation?). On rollback, I am not sure I fully understand the benefits of the feature but did use it once to remove all contributions from an anonmyous IP. Cheers, and please do not hesitate to continue educating me.... it is certainly helpful :). --Burmesedays 21:47, 4 January 2010 (EST)
Are we are in live mode :), ..... I have been giving a fair bit of thought to the issue of (non) communication between IB and the WT community. Aside from the open tech requests article at shared, is there a page you know of (preferably in the en namespace as shared is a dark mystery to the vast majoriy of users) designed for questions to and discussion with IB? I know that the history has been extremely unsatisfactory in this respect, going right back to those tortured discussions over the awful mis-handling when Evan and Maj sold the site to IB. Perhaps naively, I find it hard to believe that IB are completely anti talking to us about relatively simple improvements that could be made to Wikitravel. Hence my question about whether there is an existing place for this. I noticed that you were active in the 2006 discussions an wondered if you had any insights or pointers? --Burmesedays 22:09, 4 January 2010 (EST)
Regarding your query on my talk page on December 2nd (sorry, hadn't been logged onto the wiki since then), I make decisions of what to contribute and what not to contribute based in part on the license. For example, if a project were to use the GFDL for all contributions, I might contribute certain images with the knowledge that (because of the license) they cannot be reproduced in print unless the GFDL is reproduced as well. So, if that project's license were to change to CC-BY-SA 3.0, that would no longer be the case and images that I contributed could now be used in ways I didn't intend. Obviously the difference between CC-BY-SA 1.0 and CC-BY-SA 3.0 isn't anywhere near as great, but it's the principle of the whole thing. Cheers, JYolkowski 19:08, 13 January 2010 (EST)
CC-by-SA 3 notices
Hi Ryan, The notice is in the template. I will remove it and all the notices in the articles as I get round to them. Feel free to remove them yourself if you feel the urge, but if not I will get rid of them in time. Cheers, Peter (Southwood) Talk
Thanks for your kind note and your edits. I'll adjust as I continue with this article. Ezratrumpet 14:14, 15 February 2010 (EST)
See and do in combimation
Hi Ryan. I am asking you this question as you seem to have a amazing memory for where things are hidden in the arcane maze that is the Wikitravel file structure :). When See and Do sections are combined, how should the header be written? See and Do or See and do? Even perhaps See & Do or See & do? Instinctively, I feel See and do is correct. I know I have seen a discussion about this, but I can't re-find it! Cheers, --Burmesedays 07:36, 26 February 2010 (EST)
Shall we start a bigger WT wide list? jan 11:09, 14 April 2010 (EDT)
Ryan, I noticed that you tend to block an article like Paris instead the offending IP 184.108.40.206. May I ask why? I think it is unfair for other users that they can't work/edit an article because someone is non-compliant. I usually prefer to block the IP as this offers others the opportunity to still work and only punish the offender. jan 12:10, 15 April 2010 (EDT)
We appear to need another bureaucrat on :en, and I've nominated you for the position. Here's to hoping you will be willing to accept the weighty responsibilities of being reachable for bit flipping ;) --Peter Talk 21:11, 19 April 2010 (EDT)
Being that I not only live in the Galapagos Islands but have written the majority of Wikipedia's Galapagos section. I am aware of the operators in Galapagos. You keep removing Galapagos Online who has originated a number of tours and operate their own tours in the Galapagos while you have left over 1/2 of the operators that do not do any of their own operations but rather only are resellers. As well as a company that is illegally operating. I have followed the guideline while your edits do not. MOVERA
The only issue is that you are not following the policy you are quoting. You have numerous "travel agencies" listed that have no operation in Galapagos and are deleting agencies that do. I don't understand deleting Galapagos Explorer and leaving Galapagos Legend. The site linked on the legend is a 3rd party that has absolutely no operations in Galapagos while the listing for the Explorer was the boat itself. Both boats are exactly the same size 100 passengers. You said you deleted the explorer due to its size no one would charter it. Then you should delete the legend for the same reason. However since the owners of the legend are Klein Tours then the link to that boat should be to the owners rather than a travel agency. MOVERA
Hi Ryan! A pretty agressive business owner tried to place their business today in Beijing and ignored all warnings and tried to trick around. I blacklisted Zanys business but he keeps entering it without the link. Is there a ways to block the entry of his name? He is using multiple ip's to avoid short term blocks that i made to get his attention. Looks like a pretty knowledgable marketer. jan 10:41, 29 April 2010 (EDT)
Rents in Kiev
Ryan: Why did you remove section regarding www.roomme.net. This web site lists apartments for short term rental in Kiev and other ukrainian cities. It could be helpful for travelers to find apartments descriptions and phone numbers of its owners in one place.
Partial protection of Hong Kong
Ryan, I think Hong Kong is a candidate for partial protection. Some of the recent edit warring has been destructive and most of it initiated by anons. This is an important and largely well written article. I am not really sure whether this should be discussed first, so I have put a note at Talk:Hong Kong. Errr..... I am also fairly sure that I will mess it up if I do it myself :). --Burmesedays 11:46, 3 June 2010 (EDT)
Me Vandal i hardly think so...
Wrh2 i read up of a little of the page creation vandal and thats just wrong i don't agree with system. Oh and look at my contribs and tell me why Odenton failed. --3beetfarm 15:23, 3 June 2010 (EDT)
ya burn my edits any i have as breadcrumbs come on just trying to get some places going on here ur shooting me down. --3beetfarm 17:02, 3 June 2010 (EDT)
Hi Ryan, hope you have a joyful weekend. I just started to wonder if there is an easy trick to see the IP of logged in users? I lately became suspicious that some guys have multiple logins and would like to confirm that. This would be especially helpful if some anon IP is blocked and via another IP they create an login. Thank you very much in advance and best regards from sunny Zurich, jan 12:15, 5 June 2010 (EDT)
Moved to Talk:London.
Arjenvanslingerlandt -> Faust
Hello Ryan, would you please change my username from Arjenvanslingerlandt to Faust? Thanks in advance! --Arjenvanslingerlandt 05:38, 30 June 2010 (EDT)
Hi Ryan, currently there is a spam attack ongoing. I can delete the usertalk pages but not the user page. I always get a message that says Internal error maybe somebody else already deleted that page. What shall i do? I also enhance the blacklist but the spambot changes always a bit in the url. jan 15:47, 1 July 2010 (EDT)
Hi Ryan, What is your reason for deleting the external links to Diver Alert Network (DAN) on the Scuba Diving article? I think they are useful information for any scuba diving traveller, as DAN is an extremely valuable resource/service to the travelling diver. If you have a diving accident in an out of the way part of the world, DAN is by far the most comprhensive resource for sorting it out. No diver should remain unaware of the options. I have no connection with them except my policy. Cheers, Peter (Southwood) Talk 07:49, 9 July 2010 (EDT)
Please stop edit spamming. Read the rules carefully. And read the page. Also, use your regular account to make changes to other people's work. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Box582 (talk • contribs)
Best Western Contacts
Thanks for all the help and encouragement you're giving me all around the site. I withdrew the two deletion nominations and resolved them as you suggested. The only way I'll learn is to get feedback; but at least I usually won't make the same mistake again.
I started off with what I know well, and added or enhanced the Cahokia Mounds State Historic Site article. I think I'm pretty much finished with it, until changes or suggestions pop up. I know that it lacks a map, but would appreciate any other comments on format, phrasing, missing info, conflicts with policy, etc., so I can improve this article and also ones in the future. (I also asked this on Peterfitzgerald, but then learned he's traveling. I hate it when people just duplicate requests like this all over the place without at least acknowledging it.) Meanwhile, I'm reading policies and talk pages, trying to get some background on how things should be. And I just got a new button today: move! Next time, I won't have to get you to move something for me (thanks for doing that for Gondwana Rainforests of Australia last week). I guess still more come at 30 or 90 days. Bill in STL 00:10, 3 August 2010 (EDT)
This revert is okay. It's true that the police can get involved for people throwing around a Nazi salute, but it's far more unlikely that crowds of Germans will go after anyone. The editor was probably well intentioned, but edit was exaggerated. -- Sapphire • (Talk) • 17:06, 9 August 2010 (EDT)
Use of superlatives in Wikitravel
moved to Talk:England
I'm really enjoying the new structure you're providing in the help, policy, and administration pages. I feel that the work of assigning categories to some of the pages really needs experience of using the site and the pages, and so deliberately have not been helping to assign them. But I am certainly using them, and finding some pages which I had overlooked before. Thanks for all your work.
And today I passed my one-month on the site, and the system marked my first edit as patrolled automatic! Bill in STL 13:57, 13 August 2010 (EDT)
Hotel restaurant names
Ryan. If the restaurants in the hotel are parts of chains then I suppose the info is potentially useful. Otherwise, unless the restaurant has a particular reputation for excellence should it not be enough to note that the hotel has a restaurant? Not a big issue, but I get annoyed with the brochure material that hotels try to put on Wikitravel with the assumption that we are all going to want to stay there because of some crappy restaurant or other. Shep 02:59, 21 August 2010 (EDT)
Hello Ryan, I'm really sorry if this isn't the place to ask, but I own a tourist company and I tried to add my listing to the La Paz (Bolivia) guide, but it was refused. (It was a walking tour, remember?) I also offer a Pub Crawl tour and I'd like to add it under the "Clubs/Nightlife" section. Is it acceptable? I've seen similar listings particulary at the Buenos Aires guide. Thanks for your time! --Skykid123 ve 01:48, 27 August 2010 (EDT)
Partial protection don't work
Hi Ryan! We seem to have a curiousity in our Nusa Lembongan article. The partial protection doesn't work as anon user still can change the article. We had this in the past and i now installed a hard protection to stop the spammer. jan 10:38, 30 August 2010 (EDT)
US National Parks
Thanks for the help! I'm currently on a small national parks tour around Utah and Colorado and I add little bits after I leave the park. So far I've been to Cabrillo NM, Joshua Tree, Sequoia/Kings Canyon, Bryce Canyon, Capitol Reef, and Colorado NM. Just today I went to a small National Monument called Florissant Fossil Beds  and I noticed there was no page. In a few days I'm heading to Rocky Mountain, then to Arches, maybe Canyonlands, then Zion, then home. If you want to collaborate on a couple parks that'd be awesome! McMurphy 23:13, 1 September 2010 (EDT)
Thank you for noticing. I hope my comments are in a format appropriate to the wiki :) Davekov 21:19, 3 October 2010 (EDT)
Great to see that my efforts are noticed. We could really need some more patrollers, though, --ClausHansen 03:24, 16 October 2010 (EDT)
Hi, I am not sure if I am doing this right so please bear with me. Jan and I spent quite some time to make sure that I was within Wikitravel policy and due to someone spamming the Margarita Island board, the info was deleted. Can you please inform me as to why? Thanks.MustSee 12:43, 17 October 2010 (EDT)
Hi Ryan, could you have a look at Talk:Nusa Lembongan for me and read over my notes on an edit I made to the accom section -Lembongan Cliff Villas-
It seems to be a somewhat contentious listing and I note a miscreant IP editor has been having his way with it for a while. My understanding is that there are some issues at hand regarding some of the owners/operators there and I want to ensure I am not inadvertently editing in the details of a reseller or agent with which the owner may have a conflict. The edit history seems to indicate this listing has been carrying a yahoo email address contact and a URL leading to a page held by a domain name reseller rather than any operator or reseller. Accordingly rather than leave the listing with an unqualified yahoo address, a non working URL address and unconfirmed tel numbers I have used what appears to be a credible set of contact details. Please let me know all is OK as I am unsure of the muddied history. Thanks felix 12:57, 20 October 2010 (EDT)
Kanchanaburi - Tour operator deleted 3 times
This is now 3 times that you or some other people deleted what I added in the Do section of Kanchanaburi. I followed the rule on the tour operators. I used the <do> tag. So what's wrong ? Can you at least make the effort to explain ? Until then, I re-add what I added before.
Rock and Roll
You beat me to the punch on the revert of the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, so I took the liberty of letting the user know that it was reverted and why. -- Sapphire • (Talk) • 20:03, 27 October 2010 (EDT)
Hello, I would like to add this in the Paris by foot article: “ or, free walks with native parisians where you just need to show up at the meeting point.
I think I respect all the conditions of the tour listing policy (1, real office 2, the supplement is to walk with native parisian 3, no booking needed 4,actual tour operator) I’m new in wikitravel and my english is not the best ever so if I 've missed something please tell me, and if not, I think I’ll post and see what happens. Thank you in advance for any contributions or explanations.