Help Wikitravel grow by contributing to an article! Learn how.
New users, please see Help or go to the Pub to ask questions.

User talk:Wrh2/Archive 2010

From Wikitravel
Jump to: navigation, search

For older comments see:




External Link Policy - Blue Mountains link deleted

I'm new to editing pages here so apologies up front for any mistakes! I've used wikitravel for a while and it has been a great resource for my travels so I decided to contribute about my local area (Blue Mountains Australia). I put in a link to a great website that I've been showing friends which has aerial video of the mountains and I used it to track down some great places to see views that as a local I didn't even know about. Within minutes my link was deleted. I don't quite understand. the link has has no ads or anything commercial and seeing the Mountains from the air is great! What goes here? Why are you deleting such a good resource? I don't really feel much like contributing anymore but it has been so good so far I just want to find out what I have done wrong. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 112.141.137.70 (talkcontribs)

If you look at the edit comment I left when the link was removed, there is a pointer to our external links policy which explains when and where it is appropriate to add links to articles. -- Ryan • (talk) • 10:42, 5 March 2010 (EST)

External Link Policy - Oahu page

Yes I can see the need to keep spam links out. But removing a single link on a page that contains dozens of external links seems silly. Why not remove them all while you're at it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mrs esterhauzen (talkcontribs)

Also - Here's another problem. People lift information from other travel web sites, and then summarize that data into Wikipedia. For example - the external link you removed on the Oahu page was the source of information for the sentence explaining how many tourist beaches Oahu has. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mrs esterhauzen (talkcontribs)

Persistent touts

Yup, I realise all that. I do prefer to follow the policy and leave a meessage first though, even to an anonymous IP. If there is another infringement after the message has been left, then to the blacklist it goes (at least, that is my interpretation?). On rollback, I am not sure I fully understand the benefits of the feature but did use it once to remove all contributions from an anonmyous IP. Cheers, and please do not hesitate to continue educating me.... it is certainly helpful :). --Burmesedays 21:47, 4 January 2010 (EST)

IB

Are we are in live mode :), ..... I have been giving a fair bit of thought to the issue of (non) communication between IB and the WT community. Aside from the open tech requests article at shared, is there a page you know of (preferably in the en namespace as shared is a dark mystery to the vast majoriy of users) designed for questions to and discussion with IB? I know that the history has been extremely unsatisfactory in this respect, going right back to those tortured discussions over the awful mis-handling when Evan and Maj sold the site to IB. Perhaps naively, I find it hard to believe that IB are completely anti talking to us about relatively simple improvements that could be made to Wikitravel. Hence my question about whether there is an existing place for this. I noticed that you were active in the 2006 discussions an wondered if you had any insights or pointers? --Burmesedays 22:09, 4 January 2010 (EST)

The IB history is somewhat sordid, and while they could do a few very, very simple things that would vastly improve their relationship with the community they have (in their defense) done a good job of keeping the site running smoothly. In terms of communication, my experience is that IB tends to appear and disappear in spurts, and whether they show up in the Pub, on shared:, or wherever is unpredictable. The pages on shared are the best place to communicate - prior to creating shared we had vast problems coordinating between language versions, so any attempts to create an en: page that would be of interest to other language versions is generally strongly opposed. That said, I don't think anyone has had much luck using Wikitravel to communicate with IB, and instead I've used email during the 2-3 times where I felt it was important to talk to them and gotten a generally quick response. shared:User:KevinSours and some of the other IB folks have active "email" links on their user pages, and email addresses can also be found in some of the archives. -- Ryan • (talk) • 22:16, 4 January 2010 (EST)

License upgrade

Regarding your query on my talk page on December 2nd (sorry, hadn't been logged onto the wiki since then), I make decisions of what to contribute and what not to contribute based in part on the license. For example, if a project were to use the GFDL for all contributions, I might contribute certain images with the knowledge that (because of the license) they cannot be reproduced in print unless the GFDL is reproduced as well. So, if that project's license were to change to CC-BY-SA 3.0, that would no longer be the case and images that I contributed could now be used in ways I didn't intend. Obviously the difference between CC-BY-SA 1.0 and CC-BY-SA 3.0 isn't anywhere near as great, but it's the principle of the whole thing. Cheers, JYolkowski 19:08, 13 January 2010 (EST)

CC-by-SA 3 notices

Hi Ryan, The notice is in the template. I will remove it and all the notices in the articles as I get round to them. Feel free to remove them yourself if you feel the urge, but if not I will get rid of them in time. Cheers, Peter (Southwood) Talk

Thanks! I saw that and just sort of wondered if you still had concerns, so it's good to know it's just a template issue. Great work on the dive articles, by the way. -- Ryan • (talk) • 14:54, 30 January 2010 (EST)


Natural Bridges

Thanks for your kind note and your edits. I'll adjust as I continue with this article. Ezratrumpet 14:14, 15 February 2010 (EST)

See and do in combimation

Hi Ryan. I am asking you this question as you seem to have a amazing memory for where things are hidden in the arcane maze that is the Wikitravel file structure :). When See and Do sections are combined, how should the header be written? See and Do or See and do? Even perhaps See & Do or See & do? Instinctively, I feel See and do is correct. I know I have seen a discussion about this, but I can't re-find it! Cheers, --Burmesedays 07:36, 26 February 2010 (EST)

Looking at Google search results (here and here), it looks like we have both "See & Do" and "See and Do", but the former is much more common. I honestly can't remember ever seeing a discussion about this specific issue, but given how many times I've bashed my head over the years you should take that with a grain of salt :) -- Ryan • (talk) • 09:56, 26 February 2010 (EST)
It's "See and Do" per Wikitravel talk:Star nominations#Style Guide/Templates matching.., where we judiciously settled this question with a game of rock, paper, scissors. --Peter Talk 23:57, 26 February 2010 (EST)
Thanks Peter. That's clearly where I read it. :) --Burmesedays 01:00, 27 February 2010 (EST)
I don't follow the star nominations as closely as I probably should, so for once I can't blame head trauma for the lack of knowledge. Per Google we currently have more of the "See & Do", so if anyone cares much about this then it's worth a cleanup, although I suspect time might be better spent on bigger issues. As an aside, the use of rock, paper, scissors is a first in Wikitravel history, but would make a lot of other discussions SO much easier to resolve :) -- Ryan • (talk) • 01:04, 27 February 2010 (EST)

WikiProject reverts

Are we having a move war?  ;) --Peter Talk 10:40, 27 March 2010 (EDT)

Ha! I didn't realize that from the move log, the destination link from the move isn't marked &redirect=no. That made things even more confusing. Fixed now, though. --Peter Talk 10:55, 27 March 2010 (EDT)

Wikitravel_talk:Don't_tout#List_of_SEO

Shall we start a bigger WT wide list? jan 11:09, 14 April 2010 (EDT)

Blocking policy

Ryan, I noticed that you tend to block an article like Paris instead the offending IP 88.174.107.139. May I ask why? I think it is unfair for other users that they can't work/edit an article because someone is non-compliant. I usually prefer to block the IP as this offers others the opportunity to still work and only punish the offender. jan 12:10, 15 April 2010 (EDT)

The Wikitravel:Edit war policy is about the only guideline we have on this matter, and it suggests protecting an article briefly in cases of edit wars. If a hotel tout is editing multiple articles I'll generally block them as an attention-getting matter since there isn't a single article to block, but when a user is re-adding info to the same article then I think the edit war guidelines apply. -- Ryan • (talk) • 12:18, 15 April 2010 (EDT)

Iceland

Hi Ryan. I will soon be starting on a Wikitravel map for Iceland. I thought you might be able to help with this request. Cheers. --Burmesedays 13:02, 15 April 2010 (EDT)

I have uploaded the regions map. Please see my comment at Talk:Iceland#Other_destinations. I may well be wrong on some of the region boundaries. Easy to change, so please do comment if anything looks wrong.--Burmesedays 13:17, 16 April 2010 (EDT)

Bureaucrat?

We appear to need another bureaucrat on :en, and I've nominated you for the position. Here's to hoping you will be willing to accept the weighty responsibilities of being reachable for bit flipping ;) --Peter Talk 21:11, 19 April 2010 (EDT)

SIR -- with regard to your application to become a Bureaucrat, pursuivant to the Bureaucracy Enablement Act of 2003 (Subclause D), the Assistant Vice Undersecretary of Switch-Toggling at the Department of Redundancy Department is pleased to inform you that filing of the prerequisite forms in triplicate and notifying relevant authorities has been completed. Enjoy your shiny new red rubber stamp! Jpatokal 19:02, 18 May 2010 (EDT)
When I was very small and less toilet-trained my mom told me that someday I would do great things. Clearly she was wrong, but the red rubber stamp is much appreciated. -- Ryan • (talk) • 19:16, 18 May 2010 (EDT)

GALAPAGOS

Being that I not only live in the Galapagos Islands but have written the majority of Wikipedia's Galapagos section. I am aware of the operators in Galapagos. You keep removing Galapagos Online who has originated a number of tours and operate their own tours in the Galapagos while you have left over 1/2 of the operators that do not do any of their own operations but rather only are resellers. As well as a company that is illegally operating. I have followed the guideline while your edits do not. MOVERA

I'm a bit tired of the edit warring and at this point I'm more focused on your poor on-wiki behavior than on the merits of the particular company, so I suggest getting someone else involved. Based solely on the fact that you have re-added the listing without discussion seven times now, despite legitimate concerns about the Tour policy, I'm less willing than I should be to try to see your side of this argument. -- Ryan • (talk) • 17:01, 28 April 2010 (EDT)

The only issue is that you are not following the policy you are quoting. You have numerous "travel agencies" listed that have no operation in Galapagos and are deleting agencies that do. I don't understand deleting Galapagos Explorer and leaving Galapagos Legend. The site linked on the legend is a 3rd party that has absolutely no operations in Galapagos while the listing for the Explorer was the boat itself. Both boats are exactly the same size 100 passengers. You said you deleted the explorer due to its size no one would charter it. Then you should delete the legend for the same reason. However since the owners of the legend are Klein Tours then the link to that boat should be to the owners rather than a travel agency. MOVERA

Beijing

Hi Ryan! A pretty agressive business owner tried to place their business today in Beijing and ignored all warnings and tried to trick around. I blacklisted Zanys business but he keeps entering it without the link. Is there a ways to block the entry of his name? He is using multiple ip's to avoid short term blocks that i made to get his attention. Looks like a pretty knowledgable marketer. jan 10:41, 29 April 2010 (EDT)

You can try something like "[Zz]anys[ ]+[Cc]ar[ ]+[Rr]ental", although before doing so make sure that any articles containing "Zanys Car Rental" are updated - Driving in China and probably a few others contain that term. -- Ryan • (talk) • 11:06, 29 April 2010 (EDT)
Ryan, thank you for the fast response because the block is ending soon. I searched for Zanys and beside my warnings you found the last article i missed.jan 11:17, 29 April 2010 (EDT)


Tedious tasks

Nice work deleting those ~150 factbook pages! While it's refreshing sometimes to get some use out of the buttons, that was not a task I envied ;) --Peter Talk 22:18, 12 May 2010 (EDT)

Thanks :) I was partially inspired by your Travelers' Pub-ectomy of a few days ago. -- Ryan • (talk) • 22:27, 12 May 2010 (EDT)

Rents in Kiev

Ryan: Why did you remove section regarding www.roomme.net. This web site lists apartments for short term rental in Kiev and other ukrainian cities. It could be helpful for travelers to find apartments descriptions and phone numbers of its owners in one place.

Partial protection of Hong Kong

Ryan, I think Hong Kong is a candidate for partial protection. Some of the recent edit warring has been destructive and most of it initiated by anons. This is an important and largely well written article. I am not really sure whether this should be discussed first, so I have put a note at Talk:Hong Kong. Errr..... I am also fairly sure that I will mess it up if I do it myself :). --Burmesedays 11:46, 3 June 2010 (EDT)

I'll add my support to the Talk:Hong Kong discussion, but as an admin you can always protect an article for up to one day at your discretion; anything longer requires a notice at Wikitravel:Protected pages. As to "messing it up", I think we all messed up the first time we did most things around here - anything can be undone, so I'd say just give it a shot. The "expires" field parses human-readable text, so "1 day", "24 hours", etc should all be valid expiration dates. -- Ryan • (talk) • 11:54, 3 June 2010 (EDT)

Me Vandal i hardly think so...

Wrh2 i read up of a little of the page creation vandal and thats just wrong i don't agree with system. Oh and look at my contribs and tell me why Odenton failed. --3beetfarm 15:23, 3 June 2010 (EDT)

Edits

ya burn my edits any i have as breadcrumbs come on just trying to get some places going on here ur shooting me down. --3beetfarm 17:02, 3 June 2010 (EDT)

User IP's

Hi Ryan, hope you have a joyful weekend. I just started to wonder if there is an easy trick to see the IP of logged in users? I lately became suspicious that some guys have multiple logins and would like to confirm that. This would be especially helpful if some anon IP is blocked and via another IP they create an login. Thank you very much in advance and best regards from sunny Zurich, jan 12:15, 5 June 2010 (EDT)

I don't know of anything, although that doesn't mean that a tool doesn't exist. In the past I think we've always had to watch various users and try to identify patterns in order to make best guesses about what accounts were sock puppets. You might want to raise this issue in the Pub to see if anyone more familiar with Mediawiki knows of any available tools. -- Ryan • (talk) • 12:21, 5 June 2010 (EDT)

London Hotels

The hotels I listed were major hotel groups who have at least two hotels in Greater London. Apart from the internationally famous Savoy, Ritz and Waldorf, its not supposed to be a list of individual hotels. So can such listings remain in the general hotels section provided they are major hotel groups rather than individual hotels? I think this would be more useful and concise than an even longer list of individual hotels. Some tourists will just stay anywhere in greater London in a certain hotel group and travel around by tube.--Darrelljon 16:21, 21 June 2010 (EDT)

Variants

Actions

Destination Docents

In other languages