| || |
: ''Moved to [[Talk:Paris#Meet&greet locals]].''
: ''Moved to [[Talk:Paris#Meet&greet locals]].''
Revision as of 08:19, 12 November 2010
External Link Policy - Blue Mountains link deleted
I'm new to editing pages here so apologies up front for any mistakes!
I've used wikitravel for a while and it has been a great resource for my travels so I decided to contribute about my local area (Blue Mountains Australia). I put in a link to a great website that I've been showing friends which has aerial video of the mountains and I used it to track down some great places to see views that as a local I didn't even know about. Within minutes my link was deleted. I don't quite understand. the link has has no ads or anything commercial and seeing the Mountains from the air is great! What goes here? Why are you deleting such a good resource? I don't really feel much like contributing anymore but it has been so good so far I just want to find out what I have done wrong. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 126.96.36.199 (talk • contribs)
- If you look at the edit comment I left when the link was removed, there is a pointer to our external links policy which explains when and where it is appropriate to add links to articles. -- Ryan • (talk) • 10:42, 5 March 2010 (EST)
External Link Policy - Oahu page
Yes I can see the need to keep spam links out. But removing a single link on a page that contains dozens of external links seems silly. Why not remove them all while you're at it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mrs esterhauzen (talk • contribs)
Also - Here's another problem. People lift information from other travel web sites, and then summarize that data into Wikipedia. For example - the external link you removed on the Oahu page was the source of information for the sentence explaining how many tourist beaches Oahu has. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mrs esterhauzen (talk • contribs)
Yup, I realise all that. I do prefer to follow the policy and leave a meessage first though, even to an anonymous IP. If there is another infringement after the message has been left, then to the blacklist it goes (at least, that is my interpretation?). On rollback, I am not sure I fully understand the benefits of the feature but did use it once to remove all contributions from an anonmyous IP. Cheers, and please do not hesitate to continue educating me.... it is certainly helpful :). --Burmesedays 21:47, 4 January 2010 (EST)
Are we are in live mode :), ..... I have been giving a fair bit of thought to the issue of (non) communication between IB and the WT community. Aside from the open tech requests article at shared, is there a page you know of (preferably in the en namespace as shared is a dark mystery to the vast majoriy of users) designed for questions to and discussion with IB? I know that the history has been extremely unsatisfactory in this respect, going right back to those tortured discussions over the awful mis-handling when Evan and Maj sold the site to IB. Perhaps naively, I find it hard to believe that IB are completely anti talking to us about relatively simple improvements that could be made to Wikitravel. Hence my question about whether there is an existing place for this. I noticed that you were active in the 2006 discussions an wondered if you had any insights or pointers? --Burmesedays 22:09, 4 January 2010 (EST)
- The IB history is somewhat sordid, and while they could do a few very, very simple things that would vastly improve their relationship with the community they have (in their defense) done a good job of keeping the site running smoothly. In terms of communication, my experience is that IB tends to appear and disappear in spurts, and whether they show up in the Pub, on shared:, or wherever is unpredictable. The pages on shared are the best place to communicate - prior to creating shared we had vast problems coordinating between language versions, so any attempts to create an en: page that would be of interest to other language versions is generally strongly opposed. That said, I don't think anyone has had much luck using Wikitravel to communicate with IB, and instead I've used email during the 2-3 times where I felt it was important to talk to them and gotten a generally quick response. shared:User:KevinSours and some of the other IB folks have active "email" links on their user pages, and email addresses can also be found in some of the archives. -- Ryan • (talk) • 22:16, 4 January 2010 (EST)
Regarding your query on my talk page on December 2nd (sorry, hadn't been logged onto the wiki since then), I make decisions of what to contribute and what not to contribute based in part on the license. For example, if a project were to use the GFDL for all contributions, I might contribute certain images with the knowledge that (because of the license) they cannot be reproduced in print unless the GFDL is reproduced as well. So, if that project's license were to change to CC-BY-SA 3.0, that would no longer be the case and images that I contributed could now be used in ways I didn't intend. Obviously the difference between CC-BY-SA 1.0 and CC-BY-SA 3.0 isn't anywhere near as great, but it's the principle of the whole thing. Cheers, JYolkowski 19:08, 13 January 2010 (EST)
CC-by-SA 3 notices
The notice is in the template. I will remove it and all the notices in the articles as I get round to them. Feel free to remove them yourself if you feel the urge, but if not I will get rid of them in time. Cheers, Peter (Southwood) Talk
- Thanks! I saw that and just sort of wondered if you still had concerns, so it's good to know it's just a template issue. Great work on the dive articles, by the way. -- Ryan • (talk) • 14:54, 30 January 2010 (EST)
Thanks for your kind note and your edits. I'll adjust as I continue with this article. Ezratrumpet 14:14, 15 February 2010 (EST)
See and do in combimation
Hi Ryan. I am asking you this question as you seem to have a amazing memory for where things are hidden in the arcane maze that is the Wikitravel file structure :). When See and Do sections are combined, how should the header be written? See and Do or See and do? Even perhaps See & Do or See & do? Instinctively, I feel See and do is correct. I know I have seen a discussion about this, but I can't re-find it! Cheers, --Burmesedays 07:36, 26 February 2010 (EST)
- Looking at Google search results (here and here), it looks like we have both "See & Do" and "See and Do", but the former is much more common. I honestly can't remember ever seeing a discussion about this specific issue, but given how many times I've bashed my head over the years you should take that with a grain of salt :) -- Ryan • (talk) • 09:56, 26 February 2010 (EST)
- It's "See and Do" per Wikitravel talk:Star nominations#Style Guide/Templates matching.., where we judiciously settled this question with a game of rock, paper, scissors. --Peter Talk 23:57, 26 February 2010 (EST)
- Thanks Peter. That's clearly where I read it. :) --Burmesedays 01:00, 27 February 2010 (EST)
- I don't follow the star nominations as closely as I probably should, so for once I can't blame head trauma for the lack of knowledge. Per Google we currently have more of the "See & Do", so if anyone cares much about this then it's worth a cleanup, although I suspect time might be better spent on bigger issues. As an aside, the use of rock, paper, scissors is a first in Wikitravel history, but would make a lot of other discussions SO much easier to resolve :) -- Ryan • (talk) • 01:04, 27 February 2010 (EST)
Are we having a move war? ;) --Peter Talk 10:40, 27 March 2010 (EDT)
- Ha! I didn't realize that from the move log, the destination link from the move isn't marked &redirect=no. That made things even more confusing. Fixed now, though. --Peter Talk 10:55, 27 March 2010 (EDT)
Shall we start a bigger WT wide list? jan 11:09, 14 April 2010 (EDT)
Ryan, I noticed that you tend to block an article like Paris instead the offending IP 188.8.131.52. May I ask why? I think it is unfair for other users that they can't work/edit an article because someone is non-compliant. I usually prefer to block the IP as this offers others the opportunity to still work and only punish the offender. jan 12:10, 15 April 2010 (EDT)
- The Wikitravel:Edit war policy is about the only guideline we have on this matter, and it suggests protecting an article briefly in cases of edit wars. If a hotel tout is editing multiple articles I'll generally block them as an attention-getting matter since there isn't a single article to block, but when a user is re-adding info to the same article then I think the edit war guidelines apply. -- Ryan • (talk) • 12:18, 15 April 2010 (EDT)
Hi Ryan. I will soon be starting on a Wikitravel map for Iceland. I thought you might be able to help with this request. Cheers. --Burmesedays 13:02, 15 April 2010 (EDT)
- I have uploaded the regions map. Please see my comment at Talk:Iceland#Other_destinations. I may well be wrong on some of the region boundaries. Easy to change, so please do comment if anything looks wrong.--Burmesedays 13:17, 16 April 2010 (EDT)
We appear to need another bureaucrat on :en, and I've nominated you for the position. Here's to hoping you will be willing to accept the weighty responsibilities of being reachable for bit flipping ;) --Peter Talk 21:11, 19 April 2010 (EDT)
- SIR -- with regard to your application to become a Bureaucrat, pursuivant to the Bureaucracy Enablement Act of 2003 (Subclause D), the Assistant Vice Undersecretary of Switch-Toggling at the Department of Redundancy Department is pleased to inform you that filing of the prerequisite forms in triplicate and notifying relevant authorities has been completed. Enjoy your shiny new red rubber stamp! Jpatokal 19:02, 18 May 2010 (EDT)
- When I was very small and less toilet-trained my mom told me that someday I would do great things. Clearly she was wrong, but the red rubber stamp is much appreciated. -- Ryan • (talk) • 19:16, 18 May 2010 (EDT)
Being that I not only live in the Galapagos Islands but have written the majority of Wikipedia's Galapagos section. I am aware of the operators in Galapagos. You keep removing Galapagos Online who has originated a number of tours and operate their own tours in the Galapagos while you have left over 1/2 of the operators that do not do any of their own operations but rather only are resellers. As well as a company that is illegally operating. I have followed the guideline while your edits do not. MOVERA
- I'm a bit tired of the edit warring and at this point I'm more focused on your poor on-wiki behavior than on the merits of the particular company, so I suggest getting someone else involved. Based solely on the fact that you have re-added the listing without discussion seven times now, despite legitimate concerns about the Tour policy, I'm less willing than I should be to try to see your side of this argument. -- Ryan • (talk) • 17:01, 28 April 2010 (EDT)
The only issue is that you are not following the policy you are quoting. You have numerous "travel agencies" listed that have no operation in Galapagos and are deleting agencies that do. I don't understand deleting Galapagos Explorer and leaving Galapagos Legend. The site linked on the legend is a 3rd party that has absolutely no operations in Galapagos while the listing for the Explorer was the boat itself. Both boats are exactly the same size 100 passengers. You said you deleted the explorer due to its size no one would charter it. Then you should delete the legend for the same reason. However since the owners of the legend are Klein Tours then the link to that boat should be to the owners rather than a travel agency. MOVERA
Hi Ryan! A pretty agressive business owner tried to place their business today in Beijing and ignored all warnings and tried to trick around. I blacklisted Zanys business but he keeps entering it without the link. Is there a ways to block the entry of his name? He is using multiple ip's to avoid short term blocks that i made to get his attention. Looks like a pretty knowledgable marketer. jan 10:41, 29 April 2010 (EDT)
- You can try something like "[Zz]anys[ ]+[Cc]ar[ ]+[Rr]ental", although before doing so make sure that any articles containing "Zanys Car Rental" are updated - Driving in China and probably a few others contain that term. -- Ryan • (talk) • 11:06, 29 April 2010 (EDT)
- Ryan, thank you for the fast response because the block is ending soon. I searched for Zanys and beside my warnings you found the last article i missed.jan 11:17, 29 April 2010 (EDT)
Nice work deleting those ~150 factbook pages! While it's refreshing sometimes to get some use out of the buttons, that was not a task I envied ;) --Peter Talk 22:18, 12 May 2010 (EDT)
- Thanks :) I was partially inspired by your Travelers' Pub-ectomy of a few days ago. -- Ryan • (talk) • 22:27, 12 May 2010 (EDT)
Rents in Kiev
Ryan: Why did you remove section regarding www.roomme.net. This web site lists apartments for short term rental in Kiev and other ukrainian cities.
It could be helpful for travelers to find apartments descriptions and phone numbers of its owners in one place.
Partial protection of Hong Kong
Ryan, I think Hong Kong is a candidate for partial protection. Some of the recent edit warring has been destructive and most of it initiated by anons. This is an important and largely well written article. I am not really sure whether this should be discussed first, so I have put a note at Talk:Hong Kong. Errr..... I am also fairly sure that I will mess it up if I do it myself :). --Burmesedays 11:46, 3 June 2010 (EDT)
- I'll add my support to the Talk:Hong Kong discussion, but as an admin you can always protect an article for up to one day at your discretion; anything longer requires a notice at Wikitravel:Protected pages. As to "messing it up", I think we all messed up the first time we did most things around here - anything can be undone, so I'd say just give it a shot. The "expires" field parses human-readable text, so "1 day", "24 hours", etc should all be valid expiration dates. -- Ryan • (talk) • 11:54, 3 June 2010 (EDT)
Me Vandal i hardly think so...
Wrh2 i read up of a little of the page creation vandal and thats just wrong i don't agree with system. Oh and look at my contribs and tell me why Odenton failed. --3beetfarm 15:23, 3 June 2010 (EDT)
ya burn my edits any i have as breadcrumbs come on just trying to get some places going on here ur shooting me down. --3beetfarm 17:02, 3 June 2010 (EDT)
Hi Ryan, hope you have a joyful weekend. I just started to wonder if there is an easy trick to see the IP of logged in users? I lately became suspicious that some guys have multiple logins and would like to confirm that. This would be especially helpful if some anon IP is blocked and via another IP they create an login. Thank you very much in advance and best regards from sunny Zurich, jan 12:15, 5 June 2010 (EDT)
- I don't know of anything, although that doesn't mean that a tool doesn't exist. In the past I think we've always had to watch various users and try to identify patterns in order to make best guesses about what accounts were sock puppets. You might want to raise this issue in the Pub to see if anyone more familiar with Mediawiki knows of any available tools. -- Ryan • (talk) • 12:21, 5 June 2010 (EDT)
Moved to Talk:London.
Arjenvanslingerlandt -> Faust
Hello Ryan, would you please change my username from Arjenvanslingerlandt to Faust?
Thanks in advance!
--Arjenvanslingerlandt 05:38, 30 June 2010 (EDT)
- Sorry, that name has already been taken (see Special:Contributions/Faust). Is there another name that you would prefer? Also, note that you can check to see if a name is already in use on the Special:Listusers page. -- Ryan • (talk) • 10:36, 30 June 2010 (EDT)
- Too bad, I hadn't seen it when I checked. Mu in my eyes I guess. How about Faust 1976? Check the reults of my check here: http://wikitravel.org/wiki/en/index.php?limit=50&title=Special%3AContributions&contribs=user&target=Faust1976&namespace=&year=&month=-1
- Thanks in advance!
- --Arjenvanslingerlandt 03:20, 1 July 2010 (EDT)
- Done. Your past contributions now show up under Special:Contributions/Faust_1976. -- Ryan • (talk) • 12:07, 1 July 2010 (EDT)
- Thank you Wrh2!
- --Faust 1976 17:56, 1 July 2010 (EDT)
Hi Ryan, currently there is a spam attack ongoing. I can delete the usertalk pages but not the user page. I always get a message that says Internal error maybe somebody else already deleted that page. What shall i do? I also enhance the blacklist but the spambot changes always a bit in the url. jan 15:47, 1 July 2010 (EDT)
- I don't see any user pages that need to be deleted - is there a specific example you can point out? -- Ryan • (talk) • 17:57, 1 July 2010 (EDT)
- The spambot that creates new accounts and fills them with spam is back. He always links to pages connect dot cityname dot. Is there a way to blacklist this pattern. Also the newly created user accounts should be deleted because otherwise after thirty days they will not stay a unpatrolled. jan 06:34, 2 July 2010 (EDT)
- I don't think there is any way to delete user accounts using the tools provided to admins. As to coming up with a pattern to block the URLs being used by this bot, I'll update the ones you've created thus far, and we can generalize it further if this continues to be a problem. -- Ryan • (talk) • 11:24, 2 July 2010 (EDT)
Hi Ryan, What is your reason for deleting the external links to Diver Alert Network (DAN) on the Scuba Diving article? I think they are useful information for any scuba diving traveller, as DAN is an extremely valuable resource/service to the travelling diver. If you have a diving accident in an out of the way part of the world, DAN is by far the most comprhensive resource for sorting it out. No diver should remain unaware of the options. I have no connection with them except my policy.
Cheers, Peter (Southwood) Talk 07:49, 9 July 2010 (EDT)
- If there should be a link to them then by all means add it - I was doing a quick pass through the article since there seemed to be a number of questionable external links, and removed the DAN links mostly because there were four of them including one for travel insurance, which seemed highly suspect. A single link is probably fine if it's a worthwhile resource. -- Ryan • (talk) • 10:55, 9 July 2010 (EDT)
- I think it is a good resource as I use them myself, I admit to bias, but they are really a valuable resource for medical and equipment insurance for scuba travellers, who often have or at oleast in the past had. difficulty getting cover at reasonable premiums. DAN was set up by divers to do what the other insurers were not willing to do at the time. I will go back and look at what seems reasonable for the article. Peter (Southwood) Talk 12:31, 22 July 2010 (EDT)
Please stop edit spamming. Read the rules carefully. And read the page. Also, use your regular account to make changes to other people's work. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Box582 (talk • contribs)
- I've already responded to this issue at User talk:Booksmart2. -- Ryan • (talk) • 20:47, 15 July 2010 (EDT)
Best Western Contacts
Hi Ryan, please see my comments about Best Western at . If you need a corporate marketing contact, I will provide it for you. Cheers, WineCountryInn 15:13, 31 July 2010 (EDT)
- Thanks! The hotel chain blacklisting doesn't look like something that would ever pass muster here, although many of the marketers are HUGELY annoying and actually do a fair amount of damage to some guides. I haven't personally noticed a problem with the Best Western chain, but if it becomes an issue then I (or someone else) will definitely get in touch. -- Ryan • (talk) • 15:48, 31 July 2010 (EDT)
- I just want to make sure that it does not get to the level of blacklisting an entire cooperative of small business owners, as this would be a highly unfair broad brushing of individual businesses. My email is , if you need contacts or an intermediary to intercede on behalf of BW owners to help develop a coherent internal BW policy regarding Wikitravel. After all, I do have a foot in both camps. WineCountryInn 15:56, 31 July 2010 (EDT)
- Problem users tend to be marketing companies - someone like Special:Contributions/184.108.40.206, who never respond to talk page messages or other attempts at contact, but continually add badly formatted, tout-ish listings, and occasionally change good listings from actual travelers into content that is copy-and-pasted from marketing brochures. In the past 1-2 years the number of these users has increased dramatically, and while we've established some guidelines for them to follow, it is often difficult to make sure that their edits are dealt with, hence the discussion about blacklisting chains that use them. That discussion, however, came no where close to achieving consensus, based on some strong opinions that "broad brushing" (as you've said) is the wrong approach for dealing with problem users, and it would only be if the problem worsened to the point where it was out of control that I could ever see such a measure being implemented. Long story short, it would be great to be able to deal with the marketers, but don't worry about entire chains getting blacklisted. -- Ryan • (talk) • 16:14, 31 July 2010 (EDT)
Thanks for all the help and encouragement you're giving me all around the site. I withdrew the two deletion nominations and resolved them as you suggested.
The only way I'll learn is to get feedback; but at least I usually won't make the same mistake again.
I started off with what I know well, and added or enhanced the Cahokia Mounds State Historic Site article. I think I'm pretty much finished with it, until changes or suggestions pop up. I know that it lacks a map, but would appreciate any other comments on format, phrasing, missing info, conflicts with policy, etc., so I can improve this article and also ones in the future. (I also asked this on Peterfitzgerald, but then learned he's traveling. I hate it when people just duplicate requests like this all over the place without at least acknowledging it.) Meanwhile, I'm reading policies and talk pages, trying to get some background on how things should be. And I just got a new button today: move! Next time, I won't have to get you to move something for me (thanks for doing that for Gondwana Rainforests of Australia last week). I guess still more come at 30 or 90 days. Bill in STL 00:10, 3 August 2010 (EDT)
This revert is okay. It's true that the police can get involved for people throwing around a Nazi salute, but it's far more unlikely that crowds of Germans will go after anyone. The editor was probably well intentioned, but edit was exaggerated. -- Sapphire • (Talk) • 17:06, 9 August 2010 (EDT)
- Thanks. The user in question updated a variety of articles with advice that seemed stereotyped to me, so I suspected they might not actually be basing the edits on first-hand knowledge. Good to see you around here again, by the way. -- Ryan • (talk) • 17:40, 9 August 2010 (EDT)
- Thanks. I'm hoping to be able to edit more often now with the thesis finally turned in, but I also just sent my Mac away to be repaired and that'll be a few weeks, so as long as the little lady isn't using hers, I should be on more often. -- Sapphire • (Talk) • 17:46, 9 August 2010 (EDT)
Use of superlatives in Wikitravel
moved to Talk:England
I'm really enjoying the new structure you're providing in the help, policy, and administration pages. I feel that the work of assigning categories to some of the pages really needs experience of using the site and the pages, and so deliberately have not been helping to assign them. But I am certainly using them, and finding some pages which I had overlooked before. Thanks for all your work.
And today I passed my one-month on the site, and the system marked my first edit as patrolled automatic! Bill in STL 13:57, 13 August 2010 (EDT)
- I'll be very interested to see whether you use your newfound powers for good or evil :) Thanks for the feedback on the categories - I've been wanting to start a project to clean up the documentation for years now, so the kick in the pants was much appreciated. Hopefully once everything is tagged we can go through what's there and do some refactoring as our docs are often contradictory, duplicated, and generally not the best example of what the Wikitravel community can produce. -- Ryan • (talk) • 14:11, 13 August 2010 (EDT)
For your proactive and dedicated work on categorizing the Wikitravel namespace, I award you this barnstar. --LtPowers 09:16, 18 August 2010 (EDT)
- Much obliged - I haven't seen one of these in quite some time :) -- Ryan • (talk) • 10:36, 18 August 2010 (EDT)
Hey Ryan.... User:Hypatia requested a while back on shared to be renamed to Puzzlement, here on :en too.... can you take care of it? Thanks! – cacahuate talk 19:33, 20 August 2010 (EDT)
- Done. -- Ryan • (talk) • 19:40, 20 August 2010 (EDT)
Hotel restaurant names
Ryan. If the restaurants in the hotel are parts of chains then I suppose the info is potentially useful. Otherwise, unless the restaurant has a particular reputation for excellence should it not be enough to note that the hotel has a restaurant? Not a big issue, but I get annoyed with the brochure material that hotels try to put on Wikitravel with the assumption that we are all going to want to stay there because of some crappy restaurant or other. Shep 02:59, 21 August 2010 (EDT)
I'm really sorry if this isn't the place to ask, but I own a tourist company and I tried to add my listing to the La Paz (Bolivia) guide, but it was refused. (It was a walking tour, remember?) I also offer a Pub Crawl tour and I'd like to add it under the "Clubs/Nightlife" section. Is it acceptable? I've seen similar listings particulary at the Buenos Aires guide. Thanks for your time! --Skykid123 ve 01:48, 27 August 2010 (EDT)
Partial protection don't work
Hi Ryan! We seem to have a curiousity in our Nusa Lembongan article. The partial protection doesn't work as anon user still can change the article. We had this in the past and i now installed a hard protection to stop the spammer. jan 10:38, 30 August 2010 (EDT)
- I'm out of town for the week so my internet access is sporadic - I'd suggest posting in the Pub to see if anyone else can help out, and if not I'll take a look next time I have reasonable internet access. -- Ryan • (talk) • 02:07, 31 August 2010 (EDT)
US National Parks
Thanks for the help! I'm currently on a small national parks tour around Utah and Colorado and I add little bits after I leave the park. So far I've been to Cabrillo NM, Joshua Tree, Sequoia/Kings Canyon, Bryce Canyon, Capitol Reef, and Colorado NM. Just today I went to a small National Monument called Florissant Fossil Beds  and I noticed there was no page. In a few days I'm heading to Rocky Mountain, then to Arches, maybe Canyonlands, then Zion, then home. If you want to collaborate on a couple parks that'd be awesome! McMurphy 23:13, 1 September 2010 (EDT)
- If you enjoy hiking and weird landscapes then the Needles area of Canyonlands is highly recommended. I'm out of town right now, and my schedule tends to be unpredictable, but I'll keep an eye on your edits and try to help out where possible. Thanks again for contributing! -- Ryan • (talk) • 15:10, 2 September 2010 (EDT)
Thank you for noticing. I hope my comments are in a format appropriate to the wiki :)
Davekov 21:19, 3 October 2010 (EDT)
Hi Ryan, are there any interesting discussions ongoing that I should be aware of? Thanks. -- Sapphire • (Talk) • 15:00, 6 October 2010 (EDT)
- It's been relatively quiet lately - people seem to be busy. Wikitravel:Star nominations could use some comments, and I'm sure the Pub has the usual complement of discussions, but there aren't currently any deeply significant discussions that are very active. One major difference in the site since you were last really active here a few years ago is that it's become increasingly difficult to deal with marketers, so policies with respect to them have tightened significantly, and blocks of up to 24 hours are now fairly common as an attention-getting measure. -- Ryan • (talk) • 15:25, 6 October 2010 (EDT)
- Right. I've followed that a while back from the recent changes list, but I didn't feel one way or the other so I removed myself from that discussion. -- Sapphire • (Talk) • 12:30, 7 October 2010 (EDT)
Great to see that my efforts are noticed. We could really need some more patrollers, though, --ClausHansen 03:24, 16 October 2010 (EDT)
Hi, I am not sure if I am doing this right so please bear with me. Jan and I spent quite some time to make sure that I was within Wikitravel policy and due to someone spamming the Margarita Island board, the info was deleted. Can you please inform me as to why? Thanks.MustSee 12:43, 17 October 2010 (EDT)
- See Talk:Margarita Island. -- Ryan • (talk) • 13:17, 17 October 2010 (EDT)
Hi Ryan, could you have a look at Talk:Nusa Lembongan for me and read over my notes on an edit I made to the accom section -Lembongan Cliff Villas-
It seems to be a somewhat contentious listing and I note a miscreant IP editor has been having his way with it for a while. My understanding is that there are some issues at hand regarding some of the owners/operators there and I want to ensure I am not inadvertently editing in the details of a reseller or agent with which the owner may have a conflict. The edit history seems to indicate this listing has been carrying a yahoo email address contact and a URL leading to a page held by a domain name reseller rather than any operator or reseller. Accordingly rather than leave the listing with an unqualified yahoo address, a non working URL address and unconfirmed tel numbers I have used what appears to be a credible set of contact details. Please let me know all is OK as I am unsure of the muddied history. Thanks felix 12:57, 20 October 2010 (EDT)
Kanchanaburi - Tour operator deleted 3 times
This is now 3 times that you or some other people deleted what I added in the Do section of Kanchanaburi. I followed the rule on the tour operators. I used the <do> tag. So what's wrong ? Can you at least make the effort to explain ? Until then, I re-add what I added before.
- You have been provided numerous pointers to our policies on tour operators. By continuing to re-add this listing you are edit warring, which is highly frowned upon. -- Ryan • (talk) • 02:27, 27 October 2010 (EDT)
Rock and Roll
You beat me to the punch on the revert of the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, so I took the liberty of letting the user know that it was reverted and why. -- Sapphire • (Talk) • 20:03, 27 October 2010 (EDT)
- Moved to Talk:Paris#Meet&greet locals.
Thank you for the explanations, now I'm wondering if there is a chance for some free tour and those with a real added value to get listed, because that's the all point of those walks, to meet real parisians (most of them are students) who wants to share their everyday life in the city and everything they know about Paris (special places where locals eat and have fun). there is very few tours that does that in english with native parisians.
This very special value is what tourists like the most (I won't put the link here but we got nice reviews on trip advisor). That is also why it has been put at first in this new category "meet and greet locals" (vs tour listing) which is honnestly something many tourists (including myself) are looking for during their trip. It could be a way to resolve this problem for all the articles of other cities. Now I fully understand that putting one tour would attract a big list of very different companies, but I wouldn't like to be rejected because of other touting companies. Is there a way we could work this through? What about this category (meet locals)? Looking foward to your answer,