Help Wikitravel grow by contributing to an article! Learn how.
New users, please see Help or go to the Pub to ask questions.

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Trondheim"

From Wikitravel
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 5: Line 5:
 
Really bad on history, and looks like a student wrote it..
 
Really bad on history, and looks like a student wrote it..
 
:Feel free to [[Wikitravel:Plunge forward|rewrite]] it instead of complaining. -- [[User:Sapphire|Andrew Haggard (Sapphire)]] 16:29, 2 August 2006 (EDT)
 
:Feel free to [[Wikitravel:Plunge forward|rewrite]] it instead of complaining. -- [[User:Sapphire|Andrew Haggard (Sapphire)]] 16:29, 2 August 2006 (EDT)
 +
 +
Removed paragraph urging people not to support beggars as "it will only add to their problem". I believe that is controverial point of view that do not belong in a travel guide.

Revision as of 15:09, 24 October 2007

I know every location has a right to its own article, but is it really worth to have a two-liner for Hell Station?

Also, am not really happy with intro line. Someone please revise it (or leave it if it's okay afterall). -- Nils 19:28, 17 Jul 2004 (EDT)

Really bad on history, and looks like a student wrote it..

Feel free to rewrite it instead of complaining. -- Andrew Haggard (Sapphire) 16:29, 2 August 2006 (EDT)

Removed paragraph urging people not to support beggars as "it will only add to their problem". I believe that is controverial point of view that do not belong in a travel guide.

Variants

Actions

Destination Docents

In other languages