Difference between revisions of "Talk:Northern Lights"

From Wikitravel
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
: I don't think this is necessary either.  [[User:Jpatokal|Jpatokal]] 13:55, 18 September 2006 (EDT)
 
: I don't think this is necessary either.  [[User:Jpatokal|Jpatokal]] 13:55, 18 September 2006 (EDT)
 +
::I'm very much in favor of keeping it.  Seeing them is most definitely ''not'' as simple as getting "anywhere above a certain latitude."  (I'll be glad to expand on this, but be ready for some science-speak -- this gets close to what I do for a living.)  There's quite a good topical article in here waiting to be written; the fact that the existing text isn't that article is a reason to improve it, not delete it. -- [[User:Bill-on-the-Hill|Bill-on-the-Hill]] 17:15, 18 September 2006 (EDT)

Revision as of 21:19, 18 September 2006

Travel article?

Do we need a separate article for this? It doesn't really fit into Wikitravel:What is an article? - you could write about places to go to see the northern lights, but that's pretty much anywhere above a certain latitude. -- Ryan 12:41, 18 September 2006 (EDT)

I don't think this is necessary either. Jpatokal 13:55, 18 September 2006 (EDT)
I'm very much in favor of keeping it. Seeing them is most definitely not as simple as getting "anywhere above a certain latitude." (I'll be glad to expand on this, but be ready for some science-speak -- this gets close to what I do for a living.) There's quite a good topical article in here waiting to be written; the fact that the existing text isn't that article is a reason to improve it, not delete it. -- Bill-on-the-Hill 17:15, 18 September 2006 (EDT)