This page is for discussing the corresponding article or guide. For questions, comments, or personal stories about this destination or topic, visit Wikitravel Extra. For more about using talk pages check out Wikitravel:Using talk pages.
I'm not a great fan of long lists, escpecially not in star articles, not sure about myself, but how about ditching that long list and doing something like this instead? the current setup doesn't really have star quality to it I think.
Though the text blurbs should be made to a more similar size to make it look more uniform
6. Nudibranch tour: At least 20 species of Ophismobranch (sea slugs) have been seen at this site. It is not impossible to see as many as 12 species on a dive, though 6 to 8 is more likely.
Black nudibranch or "(Tambja capensis) is seen in depths usually deeper than 5m, otherwise unpredictable. The adults are usually solitary, but some years ago large numbers of juveniles were seen on blue-green bushy bryozoan colonies, where they were well camouflaged. .
Brown dotted nudibranch (Cadlina sp2) are fairly frequently seen. Look for them on the fluffy lilac encrusting sponges which are common from about 6m down.
Heather's nudibranch (Redspotted nudibranch or Chromodoris heatherae) is fairly common in the deeper areas to the North East of the pinnacle. It is quite easy to see as it is white with red spots (the spots may appear brown or black in natural light).
Ink spot Nudibranch (Ceratosoma ingozi) is usually seen below 6m, and seems most common below 8m.
Fiery nudibranch (Okenia amoenula) is occasionally seen. At times it may be found on yellow scrolled bryozoans where it lays its eggs. There is a ridge to the east of the pinnacle where there were large numbers at one time. Depth about 4 to 6m.
The Ghost nudibranch (Lecithophorus capensis) is often seen, frequently on bryozoans, but also on other surfaces. It may be at almost any depth. (not common in winter)
Protea nudibranch (Noumea protea) Are small and hard to spot, they are seen on the south face at similar depth, and on the north eastern reefs off the large shore gully to the north. (All year)
Red sponge nudibranch (Rostanga elandsia) may occasionally be seen on an orange encrusting sponge of exactly the same colour, making it very difficult to spot. At times it has been quite common.
Scribbled nudibranch (Doriopsilla miniata) is occasionally seen. It favours the pale yellow turreted sponge, but is also seen in other places.
Whip fan nudibranch The Whip fan nudibranch Tritonia nilsodhneri has been seen on Flagellar and Sinuous sea fans in the gap south of the pinnacle and to the north of the pinnacle.
Hi Stefan, thanks for the feedback.
My first response to this is that I initially had galleries, but was asked to remove them as a matter of policy. ie. WT does not have galleries. I have not seen this written in any guideline, so it may only be the opinion of one person, but it may also be that I have just not found it.
There is also the problem of sacrificing information for style. Which is more important? to provide the useful information or to comply with the recommended style? By following your suggestions, I must leave out some of the descriptions as there is no photo. This is not a crisis, but does to some extent reduce the completeness of the information provided, reducing value to the traveller. Similarly, the if the long captions are shortened, there is an information loss, if the short ones are lengthened, they may require padding.
If this style is to be applied to other sites it may have other problems, as yet unknown. This by itself would not bother me unduly, as trying it would be a way of finding out. Pbsouthwood 02:26, 15 October 2009 (EDT)
Where was that gallery comment? They're a relative new Mediawiki feature, so they're not much used on WT, but AFAIK there's no policy against them (I use them on occasion, see eg. Okinawa#Eat) and illustrating wildlife is a perfect application for them. I also see absolutely no reason to start shortening or lengthening captions to make them line up.
One suggestion though: instead of "hiding" the info at a single dive site, you might want to split it off into a dedicated article along the lines of African flora and fauna. Jpatokal 09:59, 15 October 2009 (EDT)
Or expanding the ones with less, anyway nothing crucial but the Protea Nudibranch paragraph was so long it looked really silly, other than that it's fine just leave it as it is. That gallery comment was about a different application - a general gallery of pictures of the destination is not the same as this, hmmm, "illustraion of concepts", I think most of us prefer to have general pictures right aligned in the text. Another example of the gallery feature is Angkor
And a general application is necessarily necessary, I think it should mainly be used/viewed as a way to avoid long lists. And as far as I can tell far from all the dive sites have this issue (though the other nomination does, in a different way)--Stefan (sertmann)Talk 10:16, 15 October 2009 (EDT)