Beautiful banners are coming to every article and you can help!
Check out our guidelines and learn how to create your own!

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cantonese phrasebook"

From Wikitravel
Jump to: navigation, search
(Cantonese phrasebook very poor)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
There are standard systems for Cantonese as well. It's harder than Putonghua for sure, but worth doing right.
 
There are standard systems for Cantonese as well. It's harder than Putonghua for sure, but worth doing right.
 +
 +
: Please [[Wikitravel:Plunge forward|plunge forward]] and make it better then! [[User:Jpatokal|Jpatokal]] 01:06, 10 Nov 2005 (EST)

Revision as of 06:10, 10 November 2005

The phrase list here is terrible! Cantonese has 6 or 7 tones to go with the sounds. If you don't get the tones, you will not be understood. Why is this section so poor compared to the Chinese phrasebook? There they use standard pinyin and explanations of the tones.

There are standard systems for Cantonese as well. It's harder than Putonghua for sure, but worth doing right.

Please plunge forward and make it better then! Jpatokal 01:06, 10 Nov 2005 (EST)

Variants

Actions

Destination Docents

In other languages