Help Wikitravel grow by contributing to an article! Learn how.

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bihar"

From Wikitravel
Jump to: navigation, search
(William Dalrymple)
(William Dalrymple)
Line 72: Line 72:
 
[[User:Manoj nav|Manoj nav]] 01:34, 5 December 2008 (EST)
 
[[User:Manoj nav|Manoj nav]] 01:34, 5 December 2008 (EST)
  
:::Apparently William Dalrymple statement appears to be false or outdates. [[User:Manoj nav|Manoj nav]] 01:43, 5 December 2008 (EST)
+
:::Apparently William Dalrymple statement appears to be false or outdated. [[User:Manoj nav|Manoj nav]] 01:43, 5 December 2008 (EST)
  
 
::::Hi [[User:Jpatokal|Jpatokal]] would you please enlighten the tourists about these information through the respective pages. [[User:Manoj nav|Manoj nav]] 01:50, 5 December 2008 (EST)
 
::::Hi [[User:Jpatokal|Jpatokal]] would you please enlighten the tourists about these information through the respective pages. [[User:Manoj nav|Manoj nav]] 01:50, 5 December 2008 (EST)

Revision as of 06:55, 5 December 2008

Contents

Understand

Um.. This section is going to have to be put in prose and each point explained. I have no idea what some of these things are. And this "the land of..the land of..the land of.." is just goofy. Texugo 02:10, 4 December 2008 (EST)

I deleted it... someone is clearly trying to sell Bihar as a tourist destination, and while it has a couple points of interest, it's mostly just the butt of many jokes, and widely known as the armpit of India. I don't know that we should make it look quite that bad in the article, but I'll continue to revert edits that try to paint it as wonderland – cacahuate talk 02:52, 4 December 2008 (EST)
I would request users to stop being racist and insulting the people and the land.
it's mostly just the butt of many jokes, and widely known as the armpit of India.
The above line don't says anything about Bihar, but about the person who speaks it. For God's sake stop ranting. Is there no rule on this website? Manoj nav 05:32, 4 December 2008 (EST)

Improvement

The article needs a lot of improvement. Many new article related on places in Bihar has to be started.

Bihar had many important tourist places like Bodh Gaya, Gaya, Nalanda, Patna, Vaisali etc, which are important to Buddhist tourists, who visit these sites every year in huge number. We need good tourist information guide for all these places. These articles should also convey information about the improved law and order situation in the state.

Manoj nav 06:05, 4 December 2008 (EST)

I think there is going to have to be a compromise here. Instead of erasing what was previously written here, it's probably better to qualify it, using phrases like, for example, "Bihar is often referred to as the armpit of India due to its inferior infrastructure and faults in government management, but for the determined traveller, Bihar does offer a number of sites which belie its rich history." Or, "Although its history has been overshadowed by blablabla, interested travellers will find some offbeat attractions" etc. To give a balanced view, I think the traveler needs to be aware of any lacking infrastructure or social/safety problems which may arise, yet we do need to describe the points of interest that it does have. Facts about crime indices, etc., are indeed facts and shouldn't be suppressed, and I think even the William Dalyrimple quote should stay. But it doesn't have to stop you from describing the good points as well. Texugo 07:36, 4 December 2008 (EST)
This - ""Bihar is often referred to as the armpit of India due to its inferior infrastructure and faults in government management, but for the determined traveller, Bihar does offer a number of sites which belie its rich history." Or, "Although its history has been overshadowed by blablabla, interested travellers will find some offbeat attractions" , again is a rant.
Who is William Dalyrimple and what makes his statement so important? His statement, even thought it might his truth, is just a rant. Have you visited Bihar? Do tourists visit Bihar to discover the poverty of the region? Tourists go there to see the land, monuments, to discover the people, to see farmlands, rivers, festivals and not the poverty. Who in this world is interested in other's poverty? William Dalyrimple's statement, which is in a bad tone, deserves no place here. Even if Bihar is the poorest place on the whole planet, so what? Is it a crime to be poor?
I think the traveler needs to be aware of any lacking infrastructure or social/safety problems.? It should be there in the title safty, restricted to the fact that it helps the travelers.
Users please stop using wikitravel to vomit your personal opinions and hate. Manoj nav 09:17, 4 December 2008 (EST)
I personally think it has a place here, I find it to be good writing actually, but feel free to continue the paragraphs with some pluses like...
"...things have slowly improved recently, but there's still a long way to go. However the travellers who do venture here, are rewarded with a wealth of unique culture, impressive nature and friendly locals etc..."
That's my take on it anyway --Stefan (sertmann) Talk 09:22, 4 December 2008 (EST)


I would like to forward a similar discussion, on the same topic, which took place on wikipedia - here .
Dalrymple and a few others are known Bihar baiters whose writing should be taken in the right perspective. He has even denigrated the supreme sacrifice of the leader of the 1857 Mangal Pandey. Dalrymple comment is more in a bad tone. The circumstances in which he would have said this would be totally different. Manoj nav 09:50, 4 December 2008 (EST)

Instead of placing the following controversial section in the article, so that people can have a lot at it and discuss, it is better to have it in the discussion page it self.


Whatever index of prosperity and development you choose, Bihar comes triumphantly at the bottom. It has the lowest literacy, the highest number of deaths in police custody, the worst roads, the highest crime, the fewest cinemas. Its per capita income is less than half the Indian average. Not long ago it even had a major famine. -- William Dalrymple, The Age of Kali

Ancient Bihar was the birthplace of the Maurya Empire, the largest ever to rule the Indian subcontinent, and the site of the Buddha's enlightenment. Unfortunately the Maurya Empire collapsed in 185 BCE, and it's been downhill ever since. Struck by severe recession in the 1990s that saw Bihar become a byword for poverty, corruption and crime, things have slowly improved recently, but there's still a long way to go.


Why to place a controversial section in the article at all until there is a concencus? I am removing the controversial section. Manoj nav 10:01, 4 December 2008 (EST)

I have done some edit, hope everyone agrees. Manoj nav 11:02, 4 December 2008 (EST)

Cities

There is one city too many listed, magic number is 9, which one should we ditch?

William Dalrymple

...is a historian, travel writer and journalist (WP) who has spent nearly two decades living in and covering India, and his books are mandatory reading for anybody who wants to even attempt to understand India. But the point of the quote is not his opinion, but the facts he states:

Whatever index of prosperity and development you choose, Bihar comes triumphantly at the bottom. It has the lowest literacy, the highest number of deaths in police custody, the worst roads, the highest crime, the fewest cinemas. Its per capita income is less than half the Indian average. Not long ago it even had a major famine. -- William Dalrymple, The Age of Kali

If you disagree with that, then show me a state in India which has lower literacy, higher deaths in police custody, worse roads, higher crime or fewer cinemas than Bihar. Jpatokal 00:57, 5 December 2008 (EST)

...and oh, there actually is one factual inaccuracy in that. These days, Bihar's GDP per capita is not half the Indian average... it's one fifth ($148 vs $997). Jpatokal 01:05, 5 December 2008 (EST)
There are so many historian and so many journalist. I didn't even knew about William_Dalrymple before I ran into this discussion.

higher crime : Rising crime graph in MP

As per the recently released annual report of the National Crime Records Bureau, the state has earned the dubious distinction of being the crime capital of the country for third consecutive time.

MP, Maharashtra top list of states reporting crimes

Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra have earned the dubious distinction of topping the list of states reporting the most number of crime cases in the country, which registered over 19.89 lakh cases.

Manoj nav 01:34, 5 December 2008 (EST)

Apparently William Dalrymple statement appears to be false or outdated. Manoj nav 01:43, 5 December 2008 (EST)
Hi Jpatokal would you please enlighten the tourists about these information through the respective pages. Manoj nav 01:50, 5 December 2008 (EST)

Variants

Actions

Destination Docents

In other languages