Wikitravel Shared talk:22 August 2007

DerFussi's comment was hardly useful, but I really don't want to start censoring discussions based on the ToS. Jpatokal 03:36, 23 August 2007 (EDT)

Not so much censoring as reverting what amounts to vandalism in my opinion. Hanging around WT to heckle is in violation of the Terms of use, which is why I sited that.

Wikitravel is for "people who support our goals of creating a free, complete, up-to-date and reliable worldwide travel guide."

"If you're not interested in our goals..... we ask that you not use this Web service."

But I'm not going to drag it out, if you think it should stay then I'll let it stay – cacahuate ^talk 03:43, 23 August 2007 (EDT)

Deleting or changing Evan's words would be vandalism. Adding your own comment on a line below it isn't. Jpatokal 03:55, 23 August 2007 (EDT)

It should stay as a useful illustration of the useless wank produced by a certain line of thought. Gorilla Jones 08:23, 23 August 2007 (EDT)

Redirect

I thought that the redirect of this page intentionally had not been done when this page had copied, because the suggestion of moving discussion seemed to me that it was just a separation of announcement and discussion. Do we need to redirect this page? Actually, the suggestion of moving discussion/Roadmap and Redondo's agreement were lost by this redirect. -- Tatata 22:01, 9 September 2007 (EDT)

Yeah, I purposely left this as an archive, rather than a redirect, because the suggestion to move should be retained, although it is not relevant at Talk:Internet Brands (obviously), and because this was an announcement and should remain a part of the logbook. There's no need to "maintain" this as a copy of the evolving talk page at Talk:Internet Brands, but IMO it should remain as an archive. --Peter ^Talk 01:01, 10 September 2007 (EDT)