Claims As a released work of the government, it is in the public domain.; however, Wikipedia:Indian copyright law says "All government work is under copyright unlike in the Work of the United States Government. This means that even information collected under the Right to Information Act may not be copied and disseminated by the recipient of such information." So this is not PD. Jpatokal 12:57, 11 January 2007 (EST)
Licensed under a French type GPL license. It might also be licensed under the French CC-by-SA 2.0 license, which isn't exactly compatible with CC-by-SA 1.0. -- Andrew Haggard (Sapphire) 10:58, 12 January 2007 (EST)
Copyright vio. Taken directly from . On that page, this is written:
The Ordnance Survey (mapping/map data) included within this website is provided by Leeds City Council under licence from the Ordnance Survey in order to fulfill its public function to (publicise local services / act as a planning authority / attract inward investment). Persons viewing this mapping should contact Ordnance Survey should they wish to licence Ordnance Survey material for their own use.
-- 22.214.171.124 11:03, 15 January 2007 (EST) (Tsandell)
Unless expressly stated the copyright and other intellectual property rights (such as, design rights, trademarks, patents etc.) in any material provided on this web site remains the property of Metro (or as the case may be another rightful owner). Metro owned material on the web site including text and images, may not be printed, copied, reproduced, republished, downloaded, posted, displayed, modified, re-used, broadcast or transmitted in any way, except for the user's own personal non-commercial use. Permission for any other type of use must be obtained - the Metro Public Relations team on 0113-251-7214 may be contacted for details.
-- 126.96.36.199 11:24, 15 January 2007 (EST) (Tsandell)
Copyright vio. Taken from [www.leeds.world-guides.com/leeds_attractions.html].
All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced, copied, stored on a retrieval system or transmitted in any forms by any means, electronic, mechanical, recording or otherwise, without the written permission of World Guides. This work is registered and protected by UKCS Reg. no. 249412 and also by Copyscape.
-- 188.8.131.52 11:24, 15 January 2007 (EST) (Tsandell)
Image with a clearly identifiable man in the photo. I think the image violates privacy rights since there is no accompanying information regarding a model release. Delete. -- Andrew Haggard (Sapphire) 23:05, 24 January 2007 (EST)
The creator of this one is usually pretty responsive, so let's at least inquire about the model release before deleting it. I'll make the inquiry. -- Bill-on-the-Hill 23:07, 20 February 2007 (EST)
On looking at it more closely, I see that it's from Wikipedia Commons and has survived the model-release process there. However, it's CCSA 2.0 rather than 1.0, so it still looks like it's gotta go, unless someone sees something that I don't. Going once, going twice ... -- Bill-on-the-Hill 11:30, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
It is probably worth checking through all Leedslad'scontributions as all the pictures of leeds he has uploaded look like copyright vios, ie ~10-30kb in size, fuzzy (ie not taken with the kind of camera a tourist or photographer would have, but rather are at "internet resolution".) I would carry on going through his uploads, but I don't have time. at the moment. -- 184.108.40.206 11:24, 15 January 2007 (EST)
Delete - Doesn't serve the traveler in any way, the mosque/helicopter picture is fantastic and says a lot, this one doesn't... I think the article will look better without... no offense Jake, you've uploaded a ton of other great photos! – cacahuatetalk 03:42, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
Keep - nothing wrong with the image itself to warrant deletion --MiddleEastern 17:05, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
But can you give me a reason why it should be here, and describe how it in any way aids the traveler? In general images should be on the pages for a reason, not just because they happen to be taken in the place that the article is about... they should give some sort of feel for the place, or capture the essence of a certain site, etc... this one doesn't... wouldn't you agree? – cacahuatetalk 01:44, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
I suppose so, but it doesn't really violate our copyleft, it may possibly be useful somehow in the future though I very much doubt it. --MiddleEastern 12:11, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
Delete - Not useful in a travel guide -- Paul Richter 22:37, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
Delete - I uploaded this yesterday, but soon after found a better image to say what I was trying to say, so this one isn't necessary. – cacahuatetalk 20:29, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
Can't we just keep this? It might be useful for some other language, in some other article or even in the Do section of the space article - assuming that spacewalking is actually something a tourist can do... I think that as a rule, we should keep images that we may use in the future. — Ravikiran r 11:44, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
I suppose it doesn't hurt to have around, but personally I think that one spacewalking image is enough in the en:Space article, and the one that's currently opening it is sooo much better... I think anyway... – cacahuatetalk 02:15, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
I have already been up this image on Japanese Page, with the brief comment that “When will we have such wikitravelers? ” So would you please keep it? --Shoestring 10:18, 22 April 2007 (EDT)