If you have a mailto like [mailto:email@example.com] the text of the link is presented in the web browser as mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org. Instead it should be formatted as email@example.com since Actual Users don't really care about URL encodings and it's unnecessary and ugly obfuscation.
It Would Be Nice if [firstname.lastname@example.org] were treated as equivalent to [mailto:email@example.com] since email addresses really can't be confused with URLs and it would be easier for the nontechnical contributor to type. -- Colin 16:40, 27 April 2006 (EDT)
These are both good ideas. Some other url formats use "@" (to put the username in, like for an FTP site), but their usefulness on wikis in general and Wikitravel in particular are, say, 4-5 orders of magnitude less than email addresses. I agree that this is preferable. --Evan 16:50, 27 April 2006 (EDT)
You should parse it as an email-address only if it first fails to parse as a URL. Email addresses which are valid URLs (http://@wikitravel.org) can just be prefixed with mailto () to clarify what the contributor means. -- Colin 17:58, 27 April 2006 (EDT)
Perhaps I misunderstand something, but this appears to have already been implemented. --PeterTalk 16:54, 25 March 2008 (EDT)