Unwanted section heading edits
Please stop changing section headings from
Every time you do this, someone has to change them back again. There are no circumstances whatsoever where this is necessary, likewise no circumstances where it is permissible. Thanks. ~ 18.104.22.168 09:44, 24 January 2008 (EST)
Please read the copyleft guidelines (especially the Can content from other sites be used on Wikitravel? section) and if there's anything there you don't understand, please ask.
Is any of the content you're adding not copied from other websites? And if so, exactly which parts? ~ 22.214.171.124 23:43, 24 January 2008 (EST)
OK, so, can we make a fresh start?
I've reviewed the Klang article and as far as I can tell it's now free from copyvios. If you find any copyvios in there, you can delete them, but it's best to mention the source of the copyvio in the edit summary or on the talk page (or, preferably, both). Anything you delete without a reasonable explanation will be put back in again.
Please put your ORIGINAL WORK back in. ORIGINAL WORK is very welcome! - thanks in anticipation.
Any copyvios you've contributed to other articles still need to be removed (so far you've contributed - as Edriza - to Bagan Lalang, Fremantle, Shah Alam, Sungai Pelek, and of course Klang). It would be great if you could remove any such copyvios yourself. I propose to do nothing for a short while and then check back. Then, on an article-by-article basis, if I find copyvios that you've added, I propose to state the source for the example I've found, and then simply remove everything you've added to that particular article. Sorry if this sounds a bit harsh but if you think about it, really it's not. You understand the problem, and it will be a lot easier for you to fix than me, as you know what you've written yourself and what you've copied, and nobody else does.
So in a nutshell: please delete any copyvios you've added, and then the original work you've contributed can be kept.
Cheers. ~ 126.96.36.199 05:57, 25 January 2008 (EST)