User:DenisYurkin/Paper travel guides

From Wikitravel

This article is a travel topic.

WARNING: This article existed once in official namespace, but was deleted after a long VFD discussion. It was moved to the personal namespace of Denis Yurkin to attract more enthusiasts before making it back live. See the talk page for details

Traditional, paper travel guides may be considered competing with Wikitravel, but normally they are not in most cases: we use both for different purposes and information. Still, as with hotels, restaurants and anything else in travelling, there are opinions and recommendations for guides.

On this page we highlight strengths and weaknesses--as well as target audience of different travel guide series.

Dorling Kindersley -- targeted primarily to families and travellers in 30s+; strong emphasis on cultural and historical background. Very visual and coloured, full of illustrations. Far less practical than Lonely Planet. Takes for granted that visitors can travel to virtually any distant area of the country--which isn't always possible even with a car.

Lonely Planet. Favourite among many backpackers and low-adventure outdoor travellers (i.e. not professionals in cayaking-rafting-climbing etc). Not really as strong in recommending restaurants and cafes, as it is in accommodation.
Also publishes special interest guides like on cycling, world food, watching wildlife etc. Recently made all(?) its accommodation reviews available on the site.

Rough Guide. Nearest competitor to Lonely Planet.

Fodor [1]