Talk:Pitcairn Islands
Contents |
way off the beaten path... Member 00:54, 18 December 2006 (EST)
[edit] Listing challenge
Pacific Expeditions has a poor reputation. Do not undo this edit unless you can provide evidence it has a good reputation. People depend on this site having accurate, information on which to base their decisions. This isn't site to advertise on. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.8.146.42 (talk • contribs)
[edit] Highest Point
Is the highest point really called Highest Point? According to Wikipedia, the highest point has a name: Pawala Valley Ridge. Is this correct? ChubbyWimbus 23:39, 30 December 2009 (EST)
[edit] Pacific Expeditions
Can anyone please show a proof link, explain or comment -- why Pacific Expeditions has a poor reputation? I worried because I want to use them :-) --Maloff 14:58, 3 April 2010 (EDT)
- I went with Pacific Expeditions to Pitcairn on SRV Discovery (ex R/V Bounty Bay) 2011-02-22 - 2011-03-01. Everything went well (although conditions are quite "spartan"). The crew (Craig, Arthur and Ruvid) were very kind people, ready to help and the food was above expectations --Maloff 23:47, 10 March 2011 (EST)
[edit] Highest Point
"Highest Point" is the highest point along the main ridgeline of Pitcairn. This is the name used by the local people. Quite a brillant place to sit down with a 360 degree view of the mighty South Pacific Ocean - something never to forget Islandboy1 22:21, 9 March 2011 (PST)
[edit] Do not delete talk page comments
Please do not delete comments on this page. Anyone is welcome to rebut any argument made here, but the guideline that governs usage of talk pages on Wikitravel is Wikitravel:Using talk pages#Etiquette, not a Pitcairn Island legal case. -- Ryan • (talk) • 10:54, 10 March 2011 (EST)
- Again, Wikitravel policy is that disputes are resolved via discussion, not censorship. If something is factually inaccurate please present a counter-argument with any relevant facts. Repeatedly deleting the comments of others does nothing to help resolve a dispute. -- Ryan • (talk) • 22:55, 10 March 2011 (EST)
