Hope you don't mind I upgraded it to the guide. It isn't going to really get much better and it is well written. Weak, but its guide. edmontonenthusiast [ee].T.A.L.K. 01:54, 13 December 2008 (EST).
I knocked it back to usable. It doesn't have any "get in" information, and the prose is poor, rife with grammatical mistakes and an over the top informal tone. Generally, if you describe an article as "weak," it's not a guide. --PeterTalk 03:21, 13 December 2008 (EST)
If it is weak, then Winnipeg should be usable, because Gorilla said it is a weak guide. Thats where I got the idea from. Anyways, if you find gram mistakes then fix them, don't just report them please because you know where they are. Could you ellaborate further on how to fix it perhaps? edmontonenthusiast [ee].T.A.L.K. 17:44, 13 December 2008 (EST).
Pretty simple: if it has any empty sections, it's not a guide. 'Get in' is empty, and 'Get around' doesn't really sketch out the options. Gorilla Jones 18:29, 13 December 2008 (EST)